Comparative Study
Controlled Clinical Trial
English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Are There Segmental Differences of Lumbar Spondylodesis? - Comparison of the Segments L IV/V and L V/S I in Patients with Transforaminal Lumbar Intercorporal Fusion (TLIF)].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report surgical results with open TLIF (transforaminal lumbar intervertebral fusion) of segment L V/S I, in comparison with TLIF of segment L IV/V.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 60 patients with degenerative spine disease were operated with TLIF spondylodesis and followed up in a clinical and radiological study. 30 patients were operated in segment L IV/V (group 1) and another 30 in segment L V/S I (group 2). These patients were followed up 2 weeks and 12 months after surgery, by means of a clinical examination and questionnaires on pain (visual analogue scale) and quality of life (Oswestry score).

RESULTS: The rate of intra- and postoperative complications was 5 % in all 60 patients; the fusion rate was 100 %. In all patients, a 70 % improvement in back pain, leg pain and quality of life was achieved after 12 months. For leg pain and quality of life, a significantly better result was seen in group 1 than in group 2 two weeks after the operation. This may be explained by reversible dysaesthesias in 3 patients in group 2. In 2 patients in group 2, it was necessary to convert from TLIF to ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion). Directly after the operation, the mean intervertebral height was 8.2 mm in group 1 and 7.3 mm in group 2, in comparison with 7.7 mm and 6.8 mm after one year, respectively.

CONCLUSION: In patients with contraction osteochondrosis in segment L V/S I, spondylodesis in segment L V/S I is - for anatomical reasons - more likely to be linked to reversible nerve irritations than with segment L IV/V. In some cases, conversion from TLIF on ALIF is necessary. In patients with degenerative spine disease, TLIF in segments L IV/V and L V/S I is absolutely accepted as a safe and up-to-date procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app