JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of non-biologically active truncated EGF (EGFt) and full-length hEGF for delivery of Auger electron-emitting 111In to EGFR-positive breast cancer cells and tumor xenografts in athymic mice.

INTRODUCTION: EGFt is a truncated form of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) that is non-biologically active but retains binding and internalization into EGFR-positive cells. Our aim was to compare EGFt and hEGF for delivery of (111)In to human breast cancer (BC) cells and tumors and evaluate its cytotoxicity against EGFR-positive BC cells, mediated by the Auger electron emissions of (111)In.

METHODS: The binding, internalization and nuclear localization of EGFt and hEGF in MDA-MB-468 human BC cells were first assessed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Subcellular fractionation was then used to quantify the cellular and nuclear uptake of (111)In-EGFt and (111)In-hEGF in MDA-MB-468 cells. The effect of exposure in vitro to (111)In-EGFt or (111)In-hEGF on the clonogenic survival of MDA-MB-468 (10(6) EGFR/cell) or MCF-7 cells (10(4) EGFR/cell) was determined. The pharmacokinetics and tumor and normal tissue biodistribution of (111)In-EGFt was compared to (111)In-hEGF in CD-1 athymic mice with s.c. MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 tumors. Nuclear importation in MDA-MB-468 tumors was determined ex vivo by subcellular fractionation.

RESULTS: Fluorescently-labeled EGFt and hEGF were bound, internalized and localized in the nucleus of MDA-MB-468 cells. Binding of (111)In-EGFt to MDA-MB-468 cells was 8-fold lower than (111)In-hEGF, but nuclear importation as a proportion of cell-bound (111)In was 3.6-fold greater than (111)In-hEGF. Nuclear uptake of (111)In-EGFt was lower than (111)In-hEGF when differences in cell binding were taken into account. The cytotoxicity of (111)In-EGFt (1.0MBq/mL; 10 nmols/L) against MDA-MB-468 cells was 9-fold lower than (111)In-hEGF but only 2-fold lower at a higher concentration (1.85 MBq/mL; 40 nmols/L). (111)In-EGFt and (111)In-hEGF exhibited greater cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-468 cells than MCF-7 cells. (111)In-EGFt was eliminated more slowly from the blood of tumor-bearing mice and exhibited lower liver uptake but higher kidney accumulation. Uptake of (111)In-EGFt in MDA-MB-468 tumors was 2.2-fold lower than (111)In-hEGF, and was blocked by anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, nimotuzumab. Nuclear uptake into MDA-MB-468 tumor cells was higher for (111)In-EGFt than (111)In-hEGF, but when the lower tumor uptake of (111)In-EGFt was considered, there were no overall differences.

CONCLUSION: We conclude that the absence of biological activity of EGFt makes it attractive for delivery of Auger electron-emitting (111)In to EGFR-overexpressing BC, but its lower cellular and tumor uptake would limit its effectiveness compared to (111)In-hEGF.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: (111)In-EGFt may reduce the adverse effects previously observed in patients administered (111)In-hEGF since it is not biologically active, but its lower uptake by BC cells and tumors would limit its effectiveness for treatment of breast cancer.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app