Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prenatal screening at 11-13+6 weeks in assisted reproductive technology singleton pregnancies and those conceived naturally.

AIM: To investigate whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) increases the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

METHODS: A total of 2034 singleton pregnant women were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into ART (574 fetuses) and control groups (1460 fetuses conceived naturally). All pregnant women received screening according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation, London 2004 Kypros H. Nicolaides guidelines at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation. Accordingly, women with value at risk of chromosomal abnormalities >1:250 underwent chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis.

RESULTS: Mean body mass index was 22.83 ± 3.27 versus 21.29 ± 2.81 kg/m(2) in the ART and control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean maternal age was higher in the ART group (31.07 ± 4.30 vs 28.16 ± 3.99 years, P < 0.001). Crown-rump length (CRL) and biparietal diameter (BPD) were significantly higher in the ART group (P < 0.001), but free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and plasma protein-A MoM were similar between the groups. Interestingly, nuchal translucency thickness in the ART group was significantly higher than in the control group, but the difference disappeared at 13-13+6 weeks. Positive ultrasound screening rate was not significantly different. The prevalence of high risk (3.83% vs 3.83%) and that of abnormal karyotype (0.35% vs 0.21%) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the negative factors associated with the infertile women themselves, ART did not seem to increase the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Additionally, fetus size in the ART group was bigger than that in the natural conception group.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app