We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Difference in Tinnitus Treatment Outcome According to the Pulse Number of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Otology & Neurotology 2015 September
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the treatment result between 6,000 and 12,000 pulses of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and to evaluate the correct location of rTMS in Korean brains compared with that of Caucasians.
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled trial.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with chronic essential tinnitus were treated with rTMS on the left auditory cortex (AC) and prefrontal cortex (FC). AC targets were determined using the 10-20 electroencephalographic (EEG) method proposed by Langguth in 2006. Six patients received a total of 6,000 pulses rTMS (AC, 1,000; FC, 1,000; 3-d course; Group 1), and eight patients were given 12,000 pulses (AC, 2,000; FC, 1,000; 4-d course; Group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment results were assessed with pretreatment and posttreatment Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and self-rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of awareness, loudness, annoyance, and effect on daily life of tinnitus at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment. Using the individual subject's magnetic resonance image and Neuronavigation System, the location of primary AC was determined and compared with that of the 10-20 method in four patients.
RESULTS: There was no improvement of THI and VAS in Group 1. On the contrary, a substantial decrease of THI scores and VAS scores for awareness, loudness, and effect on daily life was observed in Group 2.
CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of patients, a beneficial effect of rTMS on tinnitus suppression was found in the 12,000-pulse treatment group, whereas no effect was found in the 6,000-pulse treatment group. rTMS localization based on the 10-20 EEG method seems to be valid even in Koreans with a shorter anteroposterior skull diameter.
STUDY DESIGN: Controlled trial.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Fourteen patients with chronic essential tinnitus were treated with rTMS on the left auditory cortex (AC) and prefrontal cortex (FC). AC targets were determined using the 10-20 electroencephalographic (EEG) method proposed by Langguth in 2006. Six patients received a total of 6,000 pulses rTMS (AC, 1,000; FC, 1,000; 3-d course; Group 1), and eight patients were given 12,000 pulses (AC, 2,000; FC, 1,000; 4-d course; Group 2).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment results were assessed with pretreatment and posttreatment Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and self-rating Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of awareness, loudness, annoyance, and effect on daily life of tinnitus at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment. Using the individual subject's magnetic resonance image and Neuronavigation System, the location of primary AC was determined and compared with that of the 10-20 method in four patients.
RESULTS: There was no improvement of THI and VAS in Group 1. On the contrary, a substantial decrease of THI scores and VAS scores for awareness, loudness, and effect on daily life was observed in Group 2.
CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of patients, a beneficial effect of rTMS on tinnitus suppression was found in the 12,000-pulse treatment group, whereas no effect was found in the 6,000-pulse treatment group. rTMS localization based on the 10-20 EEG method seems to be valid even in Koreans with a shorter anteroposterior skull diameter.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app