We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Experimental Assessment and Future Applications of the Shikani Tracheostomy Speaking Valve.
American Journal of Speech-language Pathology 2015 November
PURPOSE: Tracheostomy speaking valve use may increase airflow resistance and work of breathing. It remains unclear which valve offers the best performance characteristics. We compared the performance characteristics of the Shikani speaking valve (SSV; unidirectional-flow ball valve) with those of the Passy-Muir valve (PMV; bias-closed flapper valve).
METHOD: Airflow resistance was measured for both the SSV and the PMV at 8 flow amplitudes and in 3 orientations (-15°, 0°, +20°) in the bias-open and bias-closed configurations.
RESULTS: Significantly lower airflow resistance was observed for the SSV (bias open) compared with the PMV at -15° (p < .001), 0° (p < .001), and +20° (p = .006) from the horizon. No significant difference was observed between the PMV and the SSV (bias-closed) configuration at any of the tested angles. A nonsignificant trend toward decreased airflow resistance was observed between the SSV bias-open and bias-closed configurations at each of the angles tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The SSV demonstrated lower airflow resistance compared with the PMV across 8 flow amplitudes in the bias-open configuration at -15°, 0°, and +20° from the horizon. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings on patient comfort, work of breathing, phonation, and airway protection during swallowing.
METHOD: Airflow resistance was measured for both the SSV and the PMV at 8 flow amplitudes and in 3 orientations (-15°, 0°, +20°) in the bias-open and bias-closed configurations.
RESULTS: Significantly lower airflow resistance was observed for the SSV (bias open) compared with the PMV at -15° (p < .001), 0° (p < .001), and +20° (p = .006) from the horizon. No significant difference was observed between the PMV and the SSV (bias-closed) configuration at any of the tested angles. A nonsignificant trend toward decreased airflow resistance was observed between the SSV bias-open and bias-closed configurations at each of the angles tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The SSV demonstrated lower airflow resistance compared with the PMV across 8 flow amplitudes in the bias-open configuration at -15°, 0°, and +20° from the horizon. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings on patient comfort, work of breathing, phonation, and airway protection during swallowing.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app