We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
β-D-Glucan and Candida albicans germ tube antibody in ICU patients with invasive candidiasis.
Intensive Care Medicine 2015 August
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA) for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) in a prospective cohort of 107 unselected, non-neutropenic ICU patients.
METHODS: BDG (cutoff positivity ≥80 pg/mL) and CAGTA (cutoff positivity ≥1/160) assays were performed twice a week. Confounding factors included amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments, recent surgery, Gram-positive bloodstream infection, renal replacement therapy, and enteral nutrition. Patients were classified as neither colonized nor infected (n = 29), Candida spp. colonization (n = 63) (low grade, n = 32; high grade, n = 31), and invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 15).
RESULTS: BDG levels were higher in patients with IC and high-grade colonization than in the remaining groups (p = 0.012), and two consecutive measurements ≥80 pg/mL discriminated IC from the remaining groups (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.7%). For the discrimination between IC and Candida spp. colonization, the AUC for the maximum value of BDG was 0.667 (95% CI 0.544-0.790) and for the maximum value of CAGTA 0.545 (95% CI 0.395-0.694). Significant changes of BDG and CAGTA kinetics in IC patients treated with antifungals were not observed. In patients neither colonized nor infected or with low-grade Candida spp. colonization, none of the confounding factors was associated with a significant increase in BDG positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Two consecutive BDG levels ≥80 pg/mL allowed discrimination among IC and high-grade colonization. Systemic antifungal therapy could not be monitored with biomarker kinetics, and BDG levels were not subject to interference by confounding factors in either colonized or infected patients or with low-grade colonization.
METHODS: BDG (cutoff positivity ≥80 pg/mL) and CAGTA (cutoff positivity ≥1/160) assays were performed twice a week. Confounding factors included amoxicillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments, recent surgery, Gram-positive bloodstream infection, renal replacement therapy, and enteral nutrition. Patients were classified as neither colonized nor infected (n = 29), Candida spp. colonization (n = 63) (low grade, n = 32; high grade, n = 31), and invasive candidiasis (IC) (n = 15).
RESULTS: BDG levels were higher in patients with IC and high-grade colonization than in the remaining groups (p = 0.012), and two consecutive measurements ≥80 pg/mL discriminated IC from the remaining groups (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.7%). For the discrimination between IC and Candida spp. colonization, the AUC for the maximum value of BDG was 0.667 (95% CI 0.544-0.790) and for the maximum value of CAGTA 0.545 (95% CI 0.395-0.694). Significant changes of BDG and CAGTA kinetics in IC patients treated with antifungals were not observed. In patients neither colonized nor infected or with low-grade Candida spp. colonization, none of the confounding factors was associated with a significant increase in BDG positivity.
CONCLUSIONS: Two consecutive BDG levels ≥80 pg/mL allowed discrimination among IC and high-grade colonization. Systemic antifungal therapy could not be monitored with biomarker kinetics, and BDG levels were not subject to interference by confounding factors in either colonized or infected patients or with low-grade colonization.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app