Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

4A.10: PREFERENTIAL REDUCTION IN MORNING/NOCTURNAL HYPERTENSION BY RENAL DENERVATION FOR DRUG- RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: A NEW ABPM ANALYSIS OF SYMPLICITY HTN-3 AND HTN-JAPAN.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of catheter-based renal artery denervation (RDN) on change in morning and night systolic BP (SBP) defined by ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM) 6 months post-randomization.

DESIGN AND METHOD: SYMPLICITY HTN-3 and SYMPLICITY HTN-Japan are prospective, randomized, controlled trials of RDN for treatment of resistant hypertension. However, SYMPLICITY HTN-3 included a blinded, sham control and HTN-Japan control patients were not blinded and continued medical management alone. Patients in both trials were on a stable antihypertensive regimen of at least 3 drugs including a diuretic before randomization. Average morning SBP (7 am to 9 am), maximum morning SBP (between 6 am and 10 am), average nocturnal SBP (1 am to 6 am), average peak nocturnal SBP (average of 3 highest SBPs between 1 am and 6 am) and average daytime SBP were calculated using pooled patient-level ABPM data. Six-month change in SBP parameters were compared between RDN and control patients.

RESULTS: A total of 386 patients (364 from HTN-3 and 22 from Japan) received RDN and 190 patients were in the control group (171 from HTN-3 and 19 from Japan). The average morning SBP was reduced -8.0 ± 22.3 mmHg in the RDN group which was significantly more than the change in the control group (-3.5 ± 22.2 mmHg, p = 0.023). The maximum morning SBP change was -8.6 ± 22.3 mmHg for RDN patients and -4.8 ± 23.8mmHg for controls (p = 0.072). Furthermore, the change in average nocturnal and average peak nocturnal SBP was significantly greater in the RDN patients compared with the control patients; -6.3 ± 18.1 vs -1.7 ± 19.2 mmHg, p = 0.008 for average nocturnal SBP and -6.7 ± 20.0 vs -1.3 ± 20.5 mmHg, p = 0.004 for average peak nocturnal SBP. Average daytime SBP change was not significantly between the RDN and control groups (-7.1 ± 16.0 vs -5.7 ± 18.0 mmHg, p = 0.349).

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated that RDN significantly reduced morning and nighttime SBP compared with control patients suggesting potential benefit of this device approach on cardiovascular protection in drug-resistant hypertension when measurements are captured during higher risk time periods.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app