Extension Block Pinning Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Treatment of Mallet Fractures.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and associated costs of the treatment of mallet fractures with either extension block pinning or open reduction and hook plate fixation.

METHODS: We treated 22 patients for a mallet fracture that involved at least 25% of the distal phalanx articular surface. Three joints demonstrated concomitant volar subluxation. Extension block pinning was used to treat 16 fractures (group 1) and 6 were treated with open reduction and hook plate fixation (group 2). All patients were evaluated at the second, fourth, and sixth weeks after surgery. Collected data included range of motion, extensor lag, and pain status. Patients were asked to grade preoperative and postoperative pain levels on a visual analog scale. Functional outcomes were determined by Crawford criteria. We retrospectively performed a cost analysis using our institutional records.

RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 12.7 months. Visual analog scale pain scores improved by a similar amount for both groups. Preoperative pain scores were 7.0 for group 1 and 7.5 for group 2. Postoperative levels were 2.0 and 2.0, respectively. Mean extensor lag was identical for both groups, 5°. Mean flexion was 70° for group 1 and 80° for group 2. Based on the Crawford criteria, group 1 had 5 patients rated as excellent, 6 as good, 3 as fair, and 2 as poor. Group 2 outcomes were 2 excellent, 2 good, and 2 fair. Five complications occurred in group 1, and 1 in group 2. Differences noted between groups were not statistically significant. Extension block pinning was more cost-effective than hook plate fixation.

CONCLUSIONS: We find extension block pinning to be an equally effective but more cost-efficient treatment than open reduction and hook plate fixation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.