COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Correlation between Enterococcus faecalis and Persistent Intraradicular Infection Compared with Primary Intraradicular Infection: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between Enterococcus faecalis and pulpal or periradicular diseases has been studied for many years; however, whether E. faecalis is correlated with persistent intraradicular infections (teeth after failed endodontic treatments) compared with primary intraradicular infections remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to compare the prevalence of E. faecalis in primary and persistent intraradicular infections.

METHODS: An exhaustive literature search combined with specified inclusion criteria was performed to collect all studies comparing the prevalence of E. faecalis in root canals with primary and persistent intraradicular infections. Descriptive statistics were applied first because of the high heterogeneity among studies. Subgroup analysis according to different detecting methods (culture and polymerase chain reaction) and sensitivity analysis was then applied. Meta-analysis was conducted with the help of Stata/SE 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) after excluding studies with uncertain forms of pulpal and periradicular lesions in their primary infection groups.

RESULTS: The systematic review included 10 studies covering 972 teeth. Among them, 2 studies used the culture technique, 6 studies used polymerase chain reaction, and the other 2 used both techniques. The detection rate of E. faecalis by both methods was higher in persistent infections compared with untreated chronic periapical periodontitis as primary infections. The difference was statistically significant (odds ratio = 7.247; 95% confidence interval, 4.039-13.002).

CONCLUSIONS: E. faecalis is more highly correlated with persistent intraradicular infections compared with untreated chronic periapical periodontitis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app