JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pharmacological management strategies for stroke prevention following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate pharmacological treatment for stroke prevention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies examining the effect of various pharmacological treatment regimens on rates of stroke, bleeding, and death after TAVR.

METHODS: We searched Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline for RCTs and observational studies comparing ≥2 antithrombotic regimens in TAVR patients. Included antithrombotic regimens were defined as one or more antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) and/or anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants).

RESULTS: Eight studies (2 RCTs and 6 observational studies) met our inclusion criteria (n=1598). Rates of major stroke ranged from 0% to 5.6% with no detected differences between treatment arms. All-cause mortality ranged from 5% to 15%, and no differences in mortality were detected between therapies. A consistent pattern of reduction in major or life-threatening bleeding was found with a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, this difference only reached statistical significance in a single cohort study (risk ratio 0.24; 95% confidence interval 0.12, 0.46). No differences between anticoagulant therapies were detected for any endpoint. Overall, studies were underpowered to detect differences between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION: Similar rates of stroke, bleeding, and mortality were found among most studies. A trend towards reduced rates of major or life-threatening bleeding when comparing SAPT to DAPT was found. Numbers of events were small, highlighting the need for larger studies on which to base pharmacological recommendations post-TAVR.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app