Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[MRI monitoring in diagnosis and follow-up of iron overload].

OBJECTIVE: To use the technique of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2* mapping to diagnose and follow-up of patients with iron overload.

METHODS: 107 patients who were suspected to have iron overload between 2011.7-2014.3 in Peking Union Medical Colleague Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Patients had the document of MRI T2* value of liver, heart and pancreas, serum ferritin (SF), transferrin saturation (TS), transfusion amount and other related laboratory tests. T2* values were compared with SF and transfusion amount. T2* values in different organs and their relationship with SF were also evaluated. 10 patients who had been adequately chelated for more than half a year were followed up for their SF and T2* values.

RESULTS: There were 65 males and 42 females with the median age of 51(8-77)-year-old. They were 50 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 36 aplastic anemia, 10 myelofibrosis, 7 hemachromatosis and 4 thalassemia carriers. Liver T2* value was significantly related to SF (r=0.120, P=0.001), but not related to transfusion amount (r=0.019, P=0.175), whereas cardiac MRI T2* was not related either to SF or to transfusion amount. No correlation of the T2* value was found between liver and heart (r=0.015, P=0.235). 70 patients was detected for liver, heart and pancreas T2* simultaneously. Pancreas T2* was compatible to SF (r=0.061,P=0.039) and cardiac T2* (r=0.110, P=0.005), but not correlated to heptic T2* (r=0.047, P= 0.071) or transfusion amount (r=0.000, P=0.960). For the 10 well-chelated patients, during the half year follow-up period, SF changed significantly from (2 566.5±1 152.2) μg/L before chelation to (1 473.4±803.0) μg/L after chelation(P=0.001), while liver T2* remained the same [(6.0±5.1) ms, (6.3±6.0) ms respectively, P=0.629].

CONCLUSION: MRI, although related to SF to some extent, was a valuable additional methods for quantifying iron overload. Iron deposition in different organs might be not related to each other and needed to be evaluated separately. Well-chelation therapy could change SF in half-year follow-up, but T2* change needed longer time to follow-up.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app