Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Survey of American obstetricians regarding group B streptococcus: opinions and practice patterns.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate attitudes and practice patterns of obstetricians related to screening for group B streptococcal colonization and providing intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against early-onset neonatal infections with group B streptococcus.

STUDY DESIGN: We mailed a survey to 546 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, including members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network and non-Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members. Stratified random selection was used to generate samples from both of these groups.

RESULTS: The survey response rate was 60% for Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members and 42% for non-Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members. Of the 206 respondents who reported providing prenatal care, 97% collect screening samples at 35-37 weeks' gestational age. Anatomic sites used to collect samples were more variable: 62% include lower vagina and rectum, 26% include lower vagina and perianal skin but not rectum, and 5% include neither the perianal skin nor the rectum. First-line agents for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis were penicillin (71%), ampicillin (27%), and cefazolin (2%). For patients reporting a nonanaphylactic penicillin allergy, drugs used for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis were more varied: cefazolin (51%), clindamycin (36%), vancomycin (8%), and erythromycin (5%). For patients undergoing a labor induction starting with a cervical ripening agent, less than 40% typically give the first dose of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis before or at the time of cervical ripening agent administration, and 15% wait until the patient reaches the active phase of labor.

CONCLUSION: Gaps in knowledge and reported practice related to the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcus infections were similar to gaps in implementation of guidelines demonstrated in past studies. New approaches to improve implementation are warranted.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app