Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The impact of an antireflux catheter on target volume particulate distribution in liver-directed embolotherapy: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To determine if there are differences in hepatic distribution of embolic particles following infusion with a standard end-hole catheter versus an antireflux microcatheter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included nine patients (age, 48-86 y) enrolled for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), liver-dominant metastatic disease (n = 2), or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1) with resin yttrium-90 ((90)Y) microspheres. Before (90)Y treatment, each patient received two same-day sequential lobar infusions of technetium 99m ((99m)Tc) macroaggregated albumin (MAA) via a conventional end-hole catheter and an antireflux microcatheter positioned at the same location. Differences in technetium 99m-MAA distribution within tumor and nontarget sites were evaluated by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) on a qualitative and semiquantitative basis. The antireflux microcatheter was used for the ensuing (90)Y treatment, with posttreatment (90)Y positron emission tomography/computed tomography to assess distribution of (90)Y microspheres.

RESULTS: Decreases in hepatic nontarget embolization were found in all patients when the antireflux catheter was used. These decreases ranged from a factor of 0.11 to a factor of 0.76 (mean, 0.42; σ = 0.19), representing a 24%-89% reduction. Increased tumor deposition was also noted in all patients, ranging from a factor of 1.33 to a factor of 1.90 (mean, 1.68; σ = 0.20), representing a relative increase of 33%-90%. Both findings were statistically significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Although this pilot study identified differences in the downstream distribution of embolic particles when the antireflux catheter was used, further investigation is needed to determine if these findings are reproducible in a larger patient cohort and, if so, whether they are associated with any clinical impact.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app