We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reason for Lawsuit in Spinal Cord Injury Affects Final Outcome.
Spine 2015 June 2
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To review past cases and analyze them to determine whether reason for lawsuit led to a defense versus plaintiff verdict when patients sustain spinal cord injury. Secondary objectives included analyzing demographic factors and monetary awards for plaintiff verdicts and settlements.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evaluating malpractice cases could provide valuable information for the physician who has been sued by a patient. Previous studies about litigation and spine have been focused on medical tort reform and not on the reasons for litigation and lawsuit outcome.
METHODS: A large national medicolegal research service for civil and criminal court called "VerdictSearch" was queried for "spinal cord injury" between the years 2000 and 2010. Reason for lawsuit separated into 2 groups, error in diagnosis (n = 48), and error in treatment (n = 25). The anatomical region, outcome, cost, and job for sued health care workers recorded for each lawsuit.
RESULTS: Compared with physicians who were sued for errors in diagnosis, those sued for an error of treatment had a relative risk of 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.16) to receive a defense verdict (P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in demographic information, including age, sex, occupation type, and level of injury. Among specialties, surgeons had the highest number of suits. The median value for each anatomic area was highest in thoracic spine ($1.90 million), followed by cervical spine ($1.80 million) and lumbar spine ($0.750 million), although there were no statistical differences between the 3 areas (P = 0.301). The median monetary award for a plaintiff verdict was higher than that for a settlement ($2.90 million, interquartile range: 1.50-12.5 million vs. $1.45 million, interquartile range: 1.00-2.90 million, P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Physicians are more likely to successfully defend a lawsuit for an error in treatment than for an error in diagnosis. The key to increase the success of defending a lawsuit in regard to spinal cord injury is to avoid delayed and incorrect diagnosis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
OBJECTIVE: To review past cases and analyze them to determine whether reason for lawsuit led to a defense versus plaintiff verdict when patients sustain spinal cord injury. Secondary objectives included analyzing demographic factors and monetary awards for plaintiff verdicts and settlements.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evaluating malpractice cases could provide valuable information for the physician who has been sued by a patient. Previous studies about litigation and spine have been focused on medical tort reform and not on the reasons for litigation and lawsuit outcome.
METHODS: A large national medicolegal research service for civil and criminal court called "VerdictSearch" was queried for "spinal cord injury" between the years 2000 and 2010. Reason for lawsuit separated into 2 groups, error in diagnosis (n = 48), and error in treatment (n = 25). The anatomical region, outcome, cost, and job for sued health care workers recorded for each lawsuit.
RESULTS: Compared with physicians who were sued for errors in diagnosis, those sued for an error of treatment had a relative risk of 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.16) to receive a defense verdict (P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in demographic information, including age, sex, occupation type, and level of injury. Among specialties, surgeons had the highest number of suits. The median value for each anatomic area was highest in thoracic spine ($1.90 million), followed by cervical spine ($1.80 million) and lumbar spine ($0.750 million), although there were no statistical differences between the 3 areas (P = 0.301). The median monetary award for a plaintiff verdict was higher than that for a settlement ($2.90 million, interquartile range: 1.50-12.5 million vs. $1.45 million, interquartile range: 1.00-2.90 million, P = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: Physicians are more likely to successfully defend a lawsuit for an error in treatment than for an error in diagnosis. The key to increase the success of defending a lawsuit in regard to spinal cord injury is to avoid delayed and incorrect diagnosis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app