We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Lower incidence of hypotension following spinal anesthesia with 6% hydroxyethyl starch preload compared to 9 ‰ saline solution in caesarean delivery.
La Tunisie Médicale 2014 June
BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a common complication following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Techniques to prevent hypotension include preloading intravenous fluid.
AIM: To compare the effect of two preloading regimens: 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and 9‰ saline solution, to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery.
METHODS: 105 patients undergoing intrathecal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were randomized and allocated to receive a preload of 500 ml HES 130/0.4 (HES Group) or a preload of 1500 ml 9‰ saline solution (CR group). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at baseline and after spinal anesthesia (every minute for the first 10 min, every 3 min for the next 10 min, and then every 5 min for the last 20 min). The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of hypotension (defined as a 20% reduction in systolic arterial pressure from baseline) between the two preloading regimens. Vasopressor requirements (i.v. bolus of 6 mg ephedrine) were also compared.
RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was 87% in the CR group and 69% in the HES group (p= 0.028). Ephedrine requirement, incidence of nausea, and/or vomiting and neonatal outcome did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of hypotension was lower after preloading of 500 mL of HES 130/0.4 than preloading with 1500 mL of 9‰ saline solution.
AIM: To compare the effect of two preloading regimens: 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and 9‰ saline solution, to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery.
METHODS: 105 patients undergoing intrathecal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery were randomized and allocated to receive a preload of 500 ml HES 130/0.4 (HES Group) or a preload of 1500 ml 9‰ saline solution (CR group). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at baseline and after spinal anesthesia (every minute for the first 10 min, every 3 min for the next 10 min, and then every 5 min for the last 20 min). The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of hypotension (defined as a 20% reduction in systolic arterial pressure from baseline) between the two preloading regimens. Vasopressor requirements (i.v. bolus of 6 mg ephedrine) were also compared.
RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was 87% in the CR group and 69% in the HES group (p= 0.028). Ephedrine requirement, incidence of nausea, and/or vomiting and neonatal outcome did not significantly differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of hypotension was lower after preloading of 500 mL of HES 130/0.4 than preloading with 1500 mL of 9‰ saline solution.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app