Matched comparison study of total and partial epithelium removal in corneal cross-linking.

PURPOSE: To compare the 1-year results of total versus partial epithelium removal in corneal cross-linking in the treatment of progressive keratoconus.

METHODS: This retrospective study compared the results of total (the total group) versus partial (the partial group) approaches of epithelium removal in corneal cross-linking. Eighty eyes of 65 patients (40 eyes in each group) were enrolled. The mean age of the participants was 25.48 ± 4.80 years and 62.5% were male. One-year changes in vision parameters, refraction, and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) indices were compared between the two groups using repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS: One year after corneal cross-linking, uncorrected distance visual acuity in the total and partial group improved by 0.13 ± 0.42 and 0.12 ± 0.36 logMAR (P = .447), respectively, and corrected distance visual acuity improved by 0.00 ± 0.19 and 0.13 ± 0.20 logMAR (P = .001), respectively. Spherical equivalent decreased by 0.44 ± 1.25 diopters (D) in the total group and 0.56 ± 1.47 D in the partial group (P = .710). The decrease in maximum keratometry was 0.39 ± 0.93 and 0.01 ± 0.95 D in the total and partial group, respectively (P = .037), and the decrease in mean keratometry was 0.42 ± 0.93 and 0.00 ± 0.65 D (P = .015), respectively. Central corneal thickness decreased by 18.39 ± 20.66 μm in the total group and 0.11 ± 13.29 μm in the partial group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: One year after corneal cross-linking, both approaches showed similar results in terms of uncorrected distance visual acuity. With the partial approach, there was slightly better corrected distance visual acuity improvement and central corneal thickness maintenance, but slightly better corneal flattening was achieved with the total removal. Long-term studies are needed to compare these two approaches in terms of stability of results and stopping the progression of keratoconus.