Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Our experience in the management of obstructing colorectal cancer.

AIM: Comparing the different possible surgical procedures and the results in urgent/emergency and in elective surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer.

MATERIAL OF STUDY: From 2008 we operated on 238 patients affected by colorectal cancer, 136 complicated tumours, 115 obstructing and 19 perforated. 23 patients had right-sided and 92 left-sided obstructing colonic tumour, divided retrospectively in 4 groups. 18 decompressive colostomy; 32 two-stages procedures: 25 Hartmann's operations and 7 total colectomies with terminal ileostomy; 7 one-stage procedures, with defunctioning ileostomy: 4 total colectomies and 3 colonic resections with wash-out; 35 one-stage procedures with primary anastomosis+wash-out or milking.

RESULTS: Operative mortality is 7% in urgent/emergency versus 1% in elective surgery and anastomotic leakage affected 6 /58 cases, 5 requiring additional surgery. Overall, about 2/3 of the perioperative deaths were related to general complications and 1/3 to anastomotic failure. The local recurrence rate was 7% in elective and 11% in urgent/emergency surgery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Obstructing colorectal cancer is associated with a high operative mortality and a worse prognosis, in terms of recurrence and survival. Actually, immediate resection with primary anastomosis represents the goldstandard in selected patients with a low anaesthetic risk, performing either as a typical resection with wash-out, or a subtotal colectomy; a temporary defunctioning colostomy or ileostomy could be proposed for patients with an intermediate risk; in high-risk cases, advanced obstruction, simultaneous colonic perforation, metastatic or locally advanced disease, Hartmann's operation should be used, as a safer procedure. Colon stenting can be an useful palliative or bridge-to-surgery option.

KEY WORDS: Bowel obstruction, Colorectal cancer, Primary anastomosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app