We have located links that may give you full text access.
Useful but not used: pediatric critical care physician views on bedside ultrasound.
Pediatric Emergency Care 2015 March
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the learning needs of pediatric critical care (PCC) physicians in bedside ultrasound (BUS) use.
METHODS: This was a survey-based study conducted at an academic center with a PCC fellowship program. We surveyed PCC fellows and faculty to elicit their views on BUS and asked them about the frequency of use, their perception of the clinical utility, and their level of confidence in performing different BUS applications.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the self-reported use of BUS applications in the faculty and fellows, except for cardiac arrest, which 66.7% of the faculty used but none of the fellows did (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between perceived usefulness and confidence in the performance of BUS applications between the fellows and faculty. The largest gaps between perceived usefulness and confidence in performing BUS applications were for left ventricle ejection fraction (Δ = 2.72), inferior vena cava collapse (Δ = 2.67), pulmonary edema (Δ = 2.22), and pneumothorax (Δ = 2.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care providers report limited confidence in several applications that they perceive as useful and are therefore likely motivated to learn BUS applications. Concentrating curricula on those applications with the greatest differences between usefulness and confidence and building on the confidence of those applications the PCC providers are already using will serve to expand availability and increase use of this high-impact technology.
METHODS: This was a survey-based study conducted at an academic center with a PCC fellowship program. We surveyed PCC fellows and faculty to elicit their views on BUS and asked them about the frequency of use, their perception of the clinical utility, and their level of confidence in performing different BUS applications.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the self-reported use of BUS applications in the faculty and fellows, except for cardiac arrest, which 66.7% of the faculty used but none of the fellows did (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between perceived usefulness and confidence in the performance of BUS applications between the fellows and faculty. The largest gaps between perceived usefulness and confidence in performing BUS applications were for left ventricle ejection fraction (Δ = 2.72), inferior vena cava collapse (Δ = 2.67), pulmonary edema (Δ = 2.22), and pneumothorax (Δ = 2.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care providers report limited confidence in several applications that they perceive as useful and are therefore likely motivated to learn BUS applications. Concentrating curricula on those applications with the greatest differences between usefulness and confidence and building on the confidence of those applications the PCC providers are already using will serve to expand availability and increase use of this high-impact technology.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app