We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
A randomized controlled pilot study on ablative fractional CO2 laser for consecutive patients presenting with various scar types.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2015 March
BACKGROUND: Although ablative fractional laser is the gold standard for acne scars, evidence is still lacking for other types of scars.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ablative fractional 10,600-nm CO2 laser in the treatment of various scar types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed an intraindividual single-blinded randomized controlled split-lesion trial. Adult patients received 3 laser treatments at 8-week intervals for scars existing at least 1 year. Primary end points were the Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) and the assessment of adverse effects.
RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with atrophic (52%) or hypertrophic (48%) scars located mainly on the body (84%) were included in the study. At 6-month follow-up of 21 patients, the PhGA showed no statistically significant difference between the treated and untreated side of the scar (p = .70). Persistent erythema, postinflammatory pigmentary changes, and scarring after ulceration (n = 3) were observed as side effects.
CONCLUSION: In this trial involving various types of scars, the efficacy of ablative fractional CO2 laser could not be confirmed. The authors presume that different types of scars have a different response to treatment. Future studies should aim to identify the type of scars that may benefit from ablative fractional laser therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ablative fractional 10,600-nm CO2 laser in the treatment of various scar types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed an intraindividual single-blinded randomized controlled split-lesion trial. Adult patients received 3 laser treatments at 8-week intervals for scars existing at least 1 year. Primary end points were the Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) and the assessment of adverse effects.
RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with atrophic (52%) or hypertrophic (48%) scars located mainly on the body (84%) were included in the study. At 6-month follow-up of 21 patients, the PhGA showed no statistically significant difference between the treated and untreated side of the scar (p = .70). Persistent erythema, postinflammatory pigmentary changes, and scarring after ulceration (n = 3) were observed as side effects.
CONCLUSION: In this trial involving various types of scars, the efficacy of ablative fractional CO2 laser could not be confirmed. The authors presume that different types of scars have a different response to treatment. Future studies should aim to identify the type of scars that may benefit from ablative fractional laser therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app