We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Poor performance of the total kappa/lambda light chain quantification in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma.
BACKGROUND: The gold standard for paraproteinemia screening in plasma cell disorders has been serum protein electro- phoresis (SPE) with immunofixation electrophoresis (IFx); serum total and free light chain quantifications have also been used.
OBJECTIVE: To define the role of SPE, IFx and serum total light chain (sLC) determinations in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), both at diagnosis and at maximum response during treatment follow-up.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: These serological studies were performed in a group of 62 patients with MM at diagnosis, and in a subset of 29 patients at the point of maximum response to treatment.
RESULTS: At diagnosis, we found an abnormal SPE in 58%, an abnormal IFx in 92% and an abnormal sLC in 45% of the 62 patients; 64% had simultaneously abnormal results in all three serological studies. IFx alone proved to be the most sensitive of all three assays, followed by SPE, which was redundant in most instances with sLC and IFx. At maximum response, the abnormal SPE normalized in 7 cases, the abnormal IFx in 7 cases and the abnormal sLC in 7 cases. There were 12 instances in which an abnormal IFx was found despite normal sLC, and one case in which a normal IFx was found in the presence of abnormal sLC. The association between IFx and sLC was highly significant (r = 0.9274611, p < 0.000001), despite instances where a positive result for IFx was associated to a normal sLC.
CONCLUSION: All three serological methods should ideally be simultaneously performed in patients with MM both at diagnosis and throughout therapy. In this series, the total sLC assay was not more sensitive than IFx neither at diagnosis nor during follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To define the role of SPE, IFx and serum total light chain (sLC) determinations in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), both at diagnosis and at maximum response during treatment follow-up.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: These serological studies were performed in a group of 62 patients with MM at diagnosis, and in a subset of 29 patients at the point of maximum response to treatment.
RESULTS: At diagnosis, we found an abnormal SPE in 58%, an abnormal IFx in 92% and an abnormal sLC in 45% of the 62 patients; 64% had simultaneously abnormal results in all three serological studies. IFx alone proved to be the most sensitive of all three assays, followed by SPE, which was redundant in most instances with sLC and IFx. At maximum response, the abnormal SPE normalized in 7 cases, the abnormal IFx in 7 cases and the abnormal sLC in 7 cases. There were 12 instances in which an abnormal IFx was found despite normal sLC, and one case in which a normal IFx was found in the presence of abnormal sLC. The association between IFx and sLC was highly significant (r = 0.9274611, p < 0.000001), despite instances where a positive result for IFx was associated to a normal sLC.
CONCLUSION: All three serological methods should ideally be simultaneously performed in patients with MM both at diagnosis and throughout therapy. In this series, the total sLC assay was not more sensitive than IFx neither at diagnosis nor during follow-up.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app