Factors predicting recurrence after resection of clival chordoma using variable surgical approaches and radiation modalities.

BACKGROUND: Clival chordomas frequently recur because of their location and invasiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical, operative, and anatomic factors associated with clival chordoma recurrence.

METHODS: Retrospective review of clival chordomas treated at our center from 1993 to 2013.

RESULTS: Fifty patients (56% male) with median age of 59 years (range, 8-76) were newly diagnosed with clival chordoma of mean diameter 3.3 cm (range, 1.5-6.7). Symptoms included headaches (38%), diplopia (36%), and dysphagia (14%). Procedures included transsphenoidal (n=34), transoral (n=4), craniotomy (n=5), and staged approaches (n=7). Gross total resection (GTR) rate was 52%, with 83% mean volumetric reduction, values that improved over time. While the lower third of the clivus was the least likely superoinferior zone to contain tumor (upper third=72%/middle third=82%/lower third=42%), it most frequently contained residual tumor (upper third=33%/middle third=38%/lower third=63%; P<.05). Symptom improvement rates were 61% (diplopia) and 53% (headache). Postoperative radiation included proton beam (n=19), cyberknife (n=7), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (n=6), external beam (n=10), and none (n=4). At last follow-up of 47 patients, 23 (49%) remain disease-free or have stable residual tumor. Lower third of clivus progressed most after GTR (upper/mid/lower third=32%/41%/75%). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, male gender (hazard ratio [HR]=1.2/P=.03), subtotal resection (HR=5.0/P=.02), and the preoperative presence of tumor in the middle third (HR=1.2/P=.02) and lower third (HR=1.8/P=.02) of the clivus increased further growth or regrowth, while radiation modality did not.

CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore long-standing support for GTR as reducing chordoma recurrence. The lower third of the clivus frequently harbored residual or recurrent tumor, despite staged approaches providing mediolateral (transcranial+endonasal) or superoinferior (endonasal+transoral) breadth. There was no benefit of proton-based over photon-based radiation, contradicting conventional presumptions.