We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Feasibility of discriminating uric acid from non-uric acid renal stones using consecutive spatially registered low- and high-energy scans obtained on a conventional CT scanner.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2015 January
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to show the feasibility of distinguishing between uric acid (UA) and non-UA renal stones using two consecutive spatially registered low- and high-energy scans acquired on a conventional CT system.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT examinations to differentiate UA from non-UA renal stones were enrolled in this study. Immediately after patients underwent clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT, two consecutive scans (one at 80 kV and one at 140 kV) were obtained on a conventional CT scanner over the region limited to the stones identified on the dual-source scans. After 3D deformable registration of the 80- and 140-kV images, UA and non-UA stones were identified using commercial software. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of stone classification were calculated using the dual-source results as the reference standard.
RESULTS: A total of 469 stones were identified in the dual-source examinations (26 UA and 443 non-UA stones). The average in-plane stone diameter was 4.4 ± 2.5 (SD) mm (range, 2.0-18.9 mm). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying UA stones were 73.1%, 90.1%, and 89.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.7%, 96.9%, and 96.8% for stones 3 mm or larger (n = 341 [19 UA and 322 non-UA]).
CONCLUSION: Accurate differentiation of UA from non-UA renal stones is feasible using two consecutively acquired and spatially registered conventional CT scans.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients undergoing clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT examinations to differentiate UA from non-UA renal stones were enrolled in this study. Immediately after patients underwent clinically indicated dual-source dual-energy CT, two consecutive scans (one at 80 kV and one at 140 kV) were obtained on a conventional CT scanner over the region limited to the stones identified on the dual-source scans. After 3D deformable registration of the 80- and 140-kV images, UA and non-UA stones were identified using commercial software. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of stone classification were calculated using the dual-source results as the reference standard.
RESULTS: A total of 469 stones were identified in the dual-source examinations (26 UA and 443 non-UA stones). The average in-plane stone diameter was 4.4 ± 2.5 (SD) mm (range, 2.0-18.9 mm). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying UA stones were 73.1%, 90.1%, and 89.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 94.7%, 96.9%, and 96.8% for stones 3 mm or larger (n = 341 [19 UA and 322 non-UA]).
CONCLUSION: Accurate differentiation of UA from non-UA renal stones is feasible using two consecutively acquired and spatially registered conventional CT scans.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app