Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Safety Eevaluation of Free-Hand Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine; Evaluation of 1256 Screws.

Spine 2014 November 8
Study Design. Prospective studyObjective. To evaluate the safety of the lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation.Summary of Background Data. LMS fixation has been known to have risk of injury to vertebral artery, nerve root, or facet joints.Methods. A consecutive series of 178 patients undergoing planned LMS fixation were studied. Screw fixation was performed by free hand technique. Entry point of screws was 2mm medial from the center of the lateral mass. Planned divergent angle of the screw was 30 degrees. Bicortical fixation was tried in all cases. After the surgery, 3 dimensional CT scan of the cervical spine was performed in all patients. We checked number of screws in each level, divergent angle of the screws, and violation of foramen transversarium (FT), intervertebral foramen or facet joint by screws. Reliability test was performed.Results. Total 1256 screws were fixed with 269 at C3, 318 at C4, 331 at C5, and 338 screws at C6. Mean divergent angle of the screws were 34.7/33.1 degrees at C3, 33.9/32.1 at C4, 34.7/32.7 at C5, and 33.6/30.7 at C6. Incidence of FT violation was 0.876%. FT violation was most common at C6 (6/11 violations). Mean divergent angle in cases of FT violation was 15.0 degrees and was significantly smaller than that of safe cases. There was no injury to vertebral artery. There was no violation of intervertebral foramen. Incidence of facet violation was 1.433%. 17 facet violations were within fusion segment. Only one screw violated healthy facet. Facet violation was most common at C3 (12/18 violations).Conclusion. LMS fixation was safe stabilizing technique with very low incidence of violation of FT, intervertebral foramen, and facet. There is a possibility of FT violation if the divergent angle was small. FT violation was most common at C6. Facet violation was most common at C3.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app