We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Therapy of catheter-directed thrombolysis for inferior vena cava thrombosis after filter implantation].
Zhonghua Yi Xue za Zhi [Chinese medical journal] 2014 July 23
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in treating with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis after filter implantation.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 13 patients with IVC thrombosis after filter implantation was conducted at our institution from June 2009 to June 2012. A total of 26 lower extremities were involved.IVC filters were implanted via right internal jugular vein. Then CDT was performed through small saphenous vein, popliteal vein or femoral vein. The dosage of urokinase was 0.6-1 million/day. The occlusive segment in IVC was managed with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting.
RESULTS: The obstructed IVC was re-opened after CDT in 11 cases. The average CDT time was 8.3 (7-13) days. PTA (n = 2) and stenting (n = 1) were performed. A total of 4 retrievable filters were planted and retrieved later successfully.No severe complications occurred. During the follow-ups, no clinically detetable sighs of pulmonary embolism were observed.
CONCLUSION: CDT is effective, safe and feasible in the treatment of IVC thrombosis after filter implantation.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 13 patients with IVC thrombosis after filter implantation was conducted at our institution from June 2009 to June 2012. A total of 26 lower extremities were involved.IVC filters were implanted via right internal jugular vein. Then CDT was performed through small saphenous vein, popliteal vein or femoral vein. The dosage of urokinase was 0.6-1 million/day. The occlusive segment in IVC was managed with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting.
RESULTS: The obstructed IVC was re-opened after CDT in 11 cases. The average CDT time was 8.3 (7-13) days. PTA (n = 2) and stenting (n = 1) were performed. A total of 4 retrievable filters were planted and retrieved later successfully.No severe complications occurred. During the follow-ups, no clinically detetable sighs of pulmonary embolism were observed.
CONCLUSION: CDT is effective, safe and feasible in the treatment of IVC thrombosis after filter implantation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app