We have located links that may give you full text access.
PFM.21 Treatment in fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: a prospective registry.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the influences on decision making in fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) and identify prenatal prognostic features.
METHODS: The PLUTO study included a registry of cases of isolated LUTO with conservative management or vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS). Logistic regression analysis examined prognostic features affecting outcome. For comparison of effectiveness the outcomes were survival to 2 years and renal function.
RESULTS: 45 women were registered, 78% (35/45) received conservative management. 27 women entered the registry due to clinician preference for an intervention (23 conservative, 4 VAS. Eighteen due to a patient preference for an intervention (12 conservative, 6 VAS. Influences will be explored further. Women in the conservative registry group were more likely: to have normal liquor volume at diagnosis (>5(th) centile) (p = 0.05) and have a later diagnosis >24 weeks compared to randomised group (p = 0.003). These variables were associated with improved survival to 28 days in a mutivariable logistic regression analysis. At two years there was 20% (2/10) alive in the shunt group and 66% (23/35) in the conservative, RR 0.30 (95% CI 0.09, 1.08) p = 0.01. At 2 years in both groups 14 had normal renal function (one in shunt, 13 in conservative). There was a high false positive antenatal diagnosis rate in the conservative group (24%, 5/21 v 0% in shunt) as noted by postnatal diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The majority of fetuses in the registry had conservative management, associated with better outcomes. A significant proportion of prenatal cases had normal liquor, gestational age >24 weeks and false positive diagnosis.
METHODS: The PLUTO study included a registry of cases of isolated LUTO with conservative management or vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS). Logistic regression analysis examined prognostic features affecting outcome. For comparison of effectiveness the outcomes were survival to 2 years and renal function.
RESULTS: 45 women were registered, 78% (35/45) received conservative management. 27 women entered the registry due to clinician preference for an intervention (23 conservative, 4 VAS. Eighteen due to a patient preference for an intervention (12 conservative, 6 VAS. Influences will be explored further. Women in the conservative registry group were more likely: to have normal liquor volume at diagnosis (>5(th) centile) (p = 0.05) and have a later diagnosis >24 weeks compared to randomised group (p = 0.003). These variables were associated with improved survival to 28 days in a mutivariable logistic regression analysis. At two years there was 20% (2/10) alive in the shunt group and 66% (23/35) in the conservative, RR 0.30 (95% CI 0.09, 1.08) p = 0.01. At 2 years in both groups 14 had normal renal function (one in shunt, 13 in conservative). There was a high false positive antenatal diagnosis rate in the conservative group (24%, 5/21 v 0% in shunt) as noted by postnatal diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The majority of fetuses in the registry had conservative management, associated with better outcomes. A significant proportion of prenatal cases had normal liquor, gestational age >24 weeks and false positive diagnosis.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app