COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins: comparison between recombinant FSH plus menotropins versus recombinant FSH + LH].

BACKGROUND: Nowadays various assisted reproduction ovarian stimulation schemes are used for different clinical outcomes is interesting to compare.

OBJECTIVE: Compare two ovarian stimulation protocols: recombinant FSH + LH versus recombinant FSH + Menotropins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study, 38 cycles were analyzed, made from 2010 until 2013, assigned to two groups (n = 19 each), group 1 received FSHr + LHr, group 2 received FSHr + menotropins. Study variables were: days of ovarian stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate and number of vitrified embryos.

RESULTS: Fewer stimulation days (8.5 +/- 1.5 vs 9 +/- 1.1) were found in group 1 (recombinant gonadotropins). Group 2 (FSHr + Menotropins), had a greater total dose of gonadotropins (1930.2 +/- 346.2 vs 2000 +/- 418.8) and more retrieved oocytes (8.15 +/- 3.9 vs 8.57 +/- 4). Group 1 patients had higher pregnancy and fertilization rates (56.2 vs 36.8%, and 75.4 vs 69.3%) respectively, no statistical significance was found.

CONCLUSION: This study found higher pregnancy and fertilization rates in patients treated with recombinant gonadotropins (FSH + LH) for ovarian stimulation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app