We have located links that may give you full text access.
129 Automatic Maximal Resolution Heart Rate Adaptive Stress Perfusion Imaging: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study at 3.0T.
Heart 2014 June
INTRODUCTION: Myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with vasodilator stress has high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Current CMR perfusion pulse sequences use fixed acquisition parameters designed to acquire at least three slices heart beat and optimised for the heart rates that occur during pharmacological stress.In patients with lower heart rates, there can therefore be a significant amount of unused imaging time (Figure 1). In patients with higher heart rates, acquisition with fixed parameters may not be possible at every heart beat. A more flexible acquisition scheme could optimise acquisition parameters specifically for each patient and heart rate with potential improvements in image quality or temporal resolution. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a perfusion pulse sequence which adapts to the heart rate, maximising imaging time and acquired in-plane spatial resolution. heartjnl;100/Suppl_3/A75-a/F1F1F1 Abstract 129 Figure 1 A: Fixed resolution pulse sequence and B: Adaptive resolution pulse sequence with acquisition duration maximised for heart rate. Blue: Pre-pulse; PD - Preparation pulse Delay time; k0: true centre of K space
METHODS: A new perfusion method, which automatically adapts the acquisition duration to maximise spatial resolution whist maintaining 3 slice imaging at every heart beat was developed (Figure 1). Ten healthy volunteers (mean age 21.5 ± 1.3 years) and two patients (mean 70 years) underwent adenosine stress and rest perfusion CMR on two separate occasions using a 3.0 T whole body scanner and dedicated 32 channel cardiac coil. On one occasion, a conventional "fixed" resolution perfusion sequence was used (3 short axis slices, SENSE acceleration, acquired in-plane resolution of 2.42 × 2.4 mm). On a second occasion, the adaptive method was used. heartjnl;100/Suppl_3/A75-a/F2F2F2 Abstract 129 Figure 2 Example perfusion first pass perfusion mid-slice images A: standard optimised fixed resolution protocol with acquired resolution of 2.42 x 2.42 mm and B: adaptive resolution protocol maximising imaging time with acquired resolution of 1.74 x 1.74 mm revealing less dark rim artefact Images were evaluated blinded to the sequence and image quality graded (1 = high, 2 = adequate, 3 = poor, 4 = unusable) and DRA was measured with electronic callipers at standardised windows settings.
RESULTS: Adaptive perfusion CMR was feasible in all subjects. Mean stress heart rate (HR) was 89 ± 11 in the fixed resolution group and 90 ± 18 in the adaptive resolution group. The standard perfusion sequence acquired in-plane resolution was 2.42 mm(2) and the mean HR adaptive sequence resolution was 1.91 × 1.91 mm ± 0.41 (range 1.53-2.89)(p = 0.001). In two cases the stress HR was too high for alternate R-R interval imaging with the fixed resolution sequence resulting in alternate heart beat imaging. This did not occur with the adaptive sequence which adjusted the resolution was adapted (to 2.84 and 2.89 mm(2) respectively). The mean DRA width was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm (95% CI: 2.57-3.51) with the standard perfusion sequence and 2.1 ± 0.6 mm (95% CI: 1.65-2.57) with the adaptive sequence (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). There was no statistical difference in median image quality score.
DISCUSSION: Optimising the use of available imaging time during CMR myocardial perfusion imaging with heart rate adaptive shot acquisition duration is feasible and improves the acquired resolution and reduces dark rim artefact whilst maintaining image quality. The effect on diagnostic performance of perfusion CMR should be investigated.
METHODS: A new perfusion method, which automatically adapts the acquisition duration to maximise spatial resolution whist maintaining 3 slice imaging at every heart beat was developed (Figure 1). Ten healthy volunteers (mean age 21.5 ± 1.3 years) and two patients (mean 70 years) underwent adenosine stress and rest perfusion CMR on two separate occasions using a 3.0 T whole body scanner and dedicated 32 channel cardiac coil. On one occasion, a conventional "fixed" resolution perfusion sequence was used (3 short axis slices, SENSE acceleration, acquired in-plane resolution of 2.42 × 2.4 mm). On a second occasion, the adaptive method was used. heartjnl;100/Suppl_3/A75-a/F2F2F2 Abstract 129 Figure 2 Example perfusion first pass perfusion mid-slice images A: standard optimised fixed resolution protocol with acquired resolution of 2.42 x 2.42 mm and B: adaptive resolution protocol maximising imaging time with acquired resolution of 1.74 x 1.74 mm revealing less dark rim artefact Images were evaluated blinded to the sequence and image quality graded (1 = high, 2 = adequate, 3 = poor, 4 = unusable) and DRA was measured with electronic callipers at standardised windows settings.
RESULTS: Adaptive perfusion CMR was feasible in all subjects. Mean stress heart rate (HR) was 89 ± 11 in the fixed resolution group and 90 ± 18 in the adaptive resolution group. The standard perfusion sequence acquired in-plane resolution was 2.42 mm(2) and the mean HR adaptive sequence resolution was 1.91 × 1.91 mm ± 0.41 (range 1.53-2.89)(p = 0.001). In two cases the stress HR was too high for alternate R-R interval imaging with the fixed resolution sequence resulting in alternate heart beat imaging. This did not occur with the adaptive sequence which adjusted the resolution was adapted (to 2.84 and 2.89 mm(2) respectively). The mean DRA width was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm (95% CI: 2.57-3.51) with the standard perfusion sequence and 2.1 ± 0.6 mm (95% CI: 1.65-2.57) with the adaptive sequence (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). There was no statistical difference in median image quality score.
DISCUSSION: Optimising the use of available imaging time during CMR myocardial perfusion imaging with heart rate adaptive shot acquisition duration is feasible and improves the acquired resolution and reduces dark rim artefact whilst maintaining image quality. The effect on diagnostic performance of perfusion CMR should be investigated.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app