We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2014 October
PURPOSE: This study aimed to correlate pelvic dimensions and fetal size to the risk for cesarean section caused by protracted labor.
METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective cohort study on pregnant women with an increased risk of labor dystocia. After pelvimetry, pelvic adequacy was clinically tested in a trial of labor. A multivariable regression analysis was made to identify the risk factors for cesarean section. Two subgroups were established according to the size of the estimated fetal head circumference (HC) (arbitrary cutoffs of ≤340 and >340 mm), and the pelvic measurements were compared by the mode of delivery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated.
RESULTS: Altogether, 274 patients were ultimately included. The mean size of the maternal inlet was 1.0 cm larger in fetal HC >340 mm group compared with ≤340 mm. In the vaginal delivery group, the difference was 1.3 cm. In the multivariable modeling, maternal age (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.17), fetal HC (OR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.02-1.09), and maternal inlet circumference (OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.92-0.97) had significance for the risk of cesarean section. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) value for the pelvic inlet was 0.736 (p < 0.001, 95 % CI 0.656-0.816), and in the subgroups with fetal HC ≤340 and >340 mm, AUCs were 0.634 (p < 0.11, 95 % CI 0.493-0.775) and 0.836 (p < 0.001, 95 % CI 0.751-0921), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Labor arrest was associated with the linear relationship between the maternal pelvic dimensions and the fetal size. Therefore, the approach should be changed from standardized pelvimetric threshold values to passenger-passageway ratio analyzed by multivariable modeling to find more accurate methods to predict cephalopelvic disproportion.
METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective cohort study on pregnant women with an increased risk of labor dystocia. After pelvimetry, pelvic adequacy was clinically tested in a trial of labor. A multivariable regression analysis was made to identify the risk factors for cesarean section. Two subgroups were established according to the size of the estimated fetal head circumference (HC) (arbitrary cutoffs of ≤340 and >340 mm), and the pelvic measurements were compared by the mode of delivery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated.
RESULTS: Altogether, 274 patients were ultimately included. The mean size of the maternal inlet was 1.0 cm larger in fetal HC >340 mm group compared with ≤340 mm. In the vaginal delivery group, the difference was 1.3 cm. In the multivariable modeling, maternal age (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.17), fetal HC (OR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.02-1.09), and maternal inlet circumference (OR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.92-0.97) had significance for the risk of cesarean section. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) value for the pelvic inlet was 0.736 (p < 0.001, 95 % CI 0.656-0.816), and in the subgroups with fetal HC ≤340 and >340 mm, AUCs were 0.634 (p < 0.11, 95 % CI 0.493-0.775) and 0.836 (p < 0.001, 95 % CI 0.751-0921), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Labor arrest was associated with the linear relationship between the maternal pelvic dimensions and the fetal size. Therefore, the approach should be changed from standardized pelvimetric threshold values to passenger-passageway ratio analyzed by multivariable modeling to find more accurate methods to predict cephalopelvic disproportion.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app