We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Meibomian gland dysfunction: a comparative study of modern treatments].
Journal Français D'ophtalmologie 2014 April
PURPOSE: To evaluate a thermal pulsation treatment compared to a warming eyelid device for the management of meibomian gland dysfunction.
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups: the first had a treatment with MeiboPatch(®) on a daily basis for three months while the second had a single treatment with LipiFlow(®). The evaluation focused on a classical approach but also on a modern approach of the ocular surface (interferometry lipid layer LipiView(®)), analysis of the tear film by Oquas(®) (osmolarity by TearLab(®)) before treatment, then a month and three months later.
RESULTS: Both treatments proved to be effective with almost three times more functional meibomian glands at 3 months in the LipiFlow group and almost twice more in the MeiboPatch group (P<0.05) but the LipiFlow allows a more rapid improvement at the first month of treatment. Functional scores and classic exploration of the ocular surface except the Schirmer test also undergo a significant improvement in both groups after three months of treatment.
CONCLUSION: The combination of heat applied to the inner eyelid surface, together with simultaneous expression of the glands, during a single 12-minute treatment shows to be highly effective in treating cases of meibomian gland disease. Whilst results were excellent, and continued lid hygiene remains advised, the benefit of being able to simultaneous address potential compliance issues relating to ongoing treatment is significant. The convenience of a single 12-minute treatment versus an ongoing daily heating regime was shown to be highly desirable and a welcome relief in our patients' busy lifestyles.
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups: the first had a treatment with MeiboPatch(®) on a daily basis for three months while the second had a single treatment with LipiFlow(®). The evaluation focused on a classical approach but also on a modern approach of the ocular surface (interferometry lipid layer LipiView(®)), analysis of the tear film by Oquas(®) (osmolarity by TearLab(®)) before treatment, then a month and three months later.
RESULTS: Both treatments proved to be effective with almost three times more functional meibomian glands at 3 months in the LipiFlow group and almost twice more in the MeiboPatch group (P<0.05) but the LipiFlow allows a more rapid improvement at the first month of treatment. Functional scores and classic exploration of the ocular surface except the Schirmer test also undergo a significant improvement in both groups after three months of treatment.
CONCLUSION: The combination of heat applied to the inner eyelid surface, together with simultaneous expression of the glands, during a single 12-minute treatment shows to be highly effective in treating cases of meibomian gland disease. Whilst results were excellent, and continued lid hygiene remains advised, the benefit of being able to simultaneous address potential compliance issues relating to ongoing treatment is significant. The convenience of a single 12-minute treatment versus an ongoing daily heating regime was shown to be highly desirable and a welcome relief in our patients' busy lifestyles.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app