Elite athletes with mitral or aortic regurgitation and their cardiopulmonary capability.

BACKGROUND: Aortic or mitral valvular regurgitation (left cardiac valvular regurgitation, LCVR) of less than second-degree (< degree II) occasionally found in competitive athletes is of questionable relevance. Precisely detectable by echocardiography there is scarce published data that clarifies cardiopulmonary capacity or any limitations LCVR < degree ll may cause.

METHODS: In this single-centre study we consecutively recruited highly trained athletes (n= 14) with LCVR < degree ll detected in 2D echo. Not included were athletes with multi- or right-cardiac valvular dysfunction and structural heart disease other than bicuspid aortic valve or mitral valve prolaps. Target parameters were determined by 2D echo and spiroergometry.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences with regard to age and body mass index. Echocardiographically determined muscle mass index was increased in both groups (134 14.7 vs 129.6+/-27.5; P=0.69), whereas the left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter index was significant higher in the LCVR < degree II group (27.3 +/- 1.3 vs 25.2 +/- 2.4; P = 0.04). However, there were no significant differences with regard to (oxygen uptake) V02, at baseline (athletes with LCVR < degree II 5.7 +/- 0.9 vs controls 5 +/- 0.96, P= 0.06), at the anaerobic threshold (athletes with LCVR < degree II 47.3 +/-8.4 vs controls 47.4 +/- 5, P= 0.97) and maximally (VO2max; athletes with LCVR < degree II 57.7 6.3 vs controls 57.1 +/- 5.1, P= 0.81). Neither levels of lactate nor of brain natriuretic peptide differed significantly.

CONCLUSION: High level athletes presenting with aortic or mitral regurgitation < degree II in are not disadvantaged with regard to their cardiopulmonary capability.