We have located links that may give you full text access.
Venous sac embolization of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: safety and effectiveness at mid-term follow-up.
Acta Radiologica 2014 November
BACKGROUND: The standard technique for the transcatheter treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) involves deploying coils into the feeding arteries. We investigated whether venous sac embolization would also be a safe and useful treatment method.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of venous sac embolization for PAVMs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 15 consecutive patients (1 man, 14 women; mean age, 54 years; range, 22-76 years) with 50 PAVMs who underwent 26 procedures; four had a history of earlier cerebral infarction or exertional dyspnea. We first placed 0.018-inch interlocking detachable and/or 0.018-inch or 0.010-inch Guglielmi detachable coils to prevent systemic migration from the venous sac. We then packed the sac as tightly as possible and embolized the orifice at the proximal feeding artery. We used angiographic, clinical, and computed tomography (CT) studies to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety of these procedures. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 3-63 months) in 12 patients with 43 PAVMs; three patients (7 PAVMs) were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Immediate post-embolization angiography confirmed complete primary occlusion in 47 of 50 lesions (94%). Minor complications arose in two of 26 procedures (7.7%); they were abnormal electrocardiograms without symptoms during and pleurisy immediately after the procedure. During follow-up, 40 PAVMs were free of CT evidence of reperfusion. The mean partial arterial oxygen pressure increased from 75.3% ± 13.6 before embolization to 85.4% ± 16.3 after embolization (P < 0.01, t-test). Of the 12 patients who were available for follow-up, none experienced new-onset paradoxical embolization; pre-treatment exertional dyspnea was alleviated in one patient. There were no major complications.
CONCLUSION: Venous sac embolization for PAVMs might be safe and more effective with no reperfusion than the standard pulmonary arterial embolization.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of venous sac embolization for PAVMs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 15 consecutive patients (1 man, 14 women; mean age, 54 years; range, 22-76 years) with 50 PAVMs who underwent 26 procedures; four had a history of earlier cerebral infarction or exertional dyspnea. We first placed 0.018-inch interlocking detachable and/or 0.018-inch or 0.010-inch Guglielmi detachable coils to prevent systemic migration from the venous sac. We then packed the sac as tightly as possible and embolized the orifice at the proximal feeding artery. We used angiographic, clinical, and computed tomography (CT) studies to evaluate the treatment outcomes and safety of these procedures. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 3-63 months) in 12 patients with 43 PAVMs; three patients (7 PAVMs) were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Immediate post-embolization angiography confirmed complete primary occlusion in 47 of 50 lesions (94%). Minor complications arose in two of 26 procedures (7.7%); they were abnormal electrocardiograms without symptoms during and pleurisy immediately after the procedure. During follow-up, 40 PAVMs were free of CT evidence of reperfusion. The mean partial arterial oxygen pressure increased from 75.3% ± 13.6 before embolization to 85.4% ± 16.3 after embolization (P < 0.01, t-test). Of the 12 patients who were available for follow-up, none experienced new-onset paradoxical embolization; pre-treatment exertional dyspnea was alleviated in one patient. There were no major complications.
CONCLUSION: Venous sac embolization for PAVMs might be safe and more effective with no reperfusion than the standard pulmonary arterial embolization.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app