JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Role of non-invasive assessment in prediction of preclinical cardiac affection in multi-transfused thalassaemia major patients.

BACKGROUND: The principal cause of mortality and morbidity in β-thalassemia major (β-TM) is the iron overload as these patients receive about 20 times the normal intake of iron, which leads to iron accumulation and damage in the liver, heart, and endocrine organs. Chronically transfused patients used to die from cardiac iron overload in their teens and twenties. Monitoring of iron status through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has replaced the conventional methods of assessment, yet this modality is not readily available in centers where the disease distribution is maximal. Objectives The aim of this work is to study some simple non-invasive tools and their abilities to predict preclinical cardiac affection reflecting cardiac iron deposition (CID) in multi-transfused β-TM patients taking the T2* CMRI as a gold standard reference test.

METHODS: One hundred consecutive multi-transfused, clinically stable β-TM patients with age ranging from 16 to 30 years (mean ± SD, 21.1 ± 3.9) were included in this study. Assessment of serum ferritin, serum hepcidin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as well as cardiac assessment by echo-doppler and 24-hour Holter were used to predict CID, and consequently predict preclinical cardiac affection, in reference to CMRI results as the standard method of cardiac iron assessment.

RESULTS: According to CMRI results, patients were subdivided into a group of 42 patients with detectable myocardial iron (T*≤ 20 ms) and a group of 58 patients with no detectable myocardial iron (T* > 20 ms). No differences in age, gender, or distribution of splenectomized patients were observed between both groups. Patients with detectable myocardial iron received significantly higher number of transfusions per year than those with no detectable myocardial iron (mean ± SD, 14.6 ± 1.7 vs. 12.5 ± 1.7; P < 0.001) yet comparable levels of serum ferritin, serum hepcidin, and hepcidin/ferritin ratio (P > 0.05) were noted. Cardiac iron detection was associated with significantly lower heart rate (mean ± SD, 75 ± 6.1 vs. 80 ± 6.9; P < 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean ± SD 60.1 ± 3.2 vs. 70.1 ± 2.8; P < 0.001), and higher total number of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (median 78 vs. 14; P < 0.001). The group with CID comprised significantly more patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (15/42, 35.7% vs. 3/58, 5.2%; P < 0.001); PVCs ≥10/hour (13/42, 31% vs. 2/58, 3.4%; P < 0.001); episodes of sinus pauses (6/42, 14.3% vs. 1/58, 1.7%; P < 0.05); episodes of high-grade atrio-ventricular block (5/42, 11.9% vs. 1/58, 1.7%; P < 0.05) compared to the group with no (CID). In presence of normal LVEF, detection of 10 or more PVCs per hour was the most predictive of cardiac iron loading with a positive predictive value of 86.7% and specificity of 96.6%, and the highest likelihood ratio (9.09). Detection of more than 22 PVCs/24 hours had the best sensitivity (81%) and the best negative predictive value (84%). The positive likelihood ratio of the studied parameters was highest in case of presence of PVCs ≥10/hour and lowest in case of average heart rate with a cut-off level of ≤77.5 bpm (9.09 and 1.46, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Our results support our hypothesis that monitoring β-TM patients with echo and Holter electrocardiogram can help in the detection of preclinical cardiac affection in centers lacking cardiac MRI; however, due to relatively low sensitivity they can not fully replace CMRI. Further work is needed to identify additional simple parameters that can form a diagnostic model with adequate sensitivity.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app