JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is cryoanalgesia effective for post-thoracotomy pain?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether cryoanalgesia improves post-thoracotomy pain and recovery. Twelve articles were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. Reported measures were pain scores, additional opiate requirements, incidence of hypoesthesia and change in lung function. Half of the articles reviewed failed to demonstrate superiority of cryoanalgesia over other pain relief methods; however, additional opiate requirements were reduced in patients receiving cryoanalgesia. Change in lung function postoperatively was equivocal. Cryoanalgesia potentiated the incidence of postoperative neuropathic pain. Further analysis of the source of cryoanalgesia, duration, temperature obtained and extent of blockade revealed numerous discrepancies. Three studies utilized CO2 as the source of cryoanalgesia and four used nitrous oxide, but at differing temperatures and duration. Five studies did not reveal the source of cyroanalgesia. The number of intercostal nerves anaesthetized in each study varied. Seven articles anaesthetized three intercostal nerves, three articles used five intercostal nerves, one article used four intercostal nerves and one used one intercostal nerve at the thoracotomy site. Thoracotomy closure and site of area of chest drain insertion may have a role in postoperative pain; but only one article explained method of closure, and two articles mentioned placement of chest drain through blocked dermatomes. No causal inferences can be made by the above results as they are not directly comparable due to confounding variables between studies. Currently, the evidence does not support the use of cryoanalgesia alone as an effective method for relieving post-thoracotomy pain.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app