We have located links that may give you full text access.
Increase in proximal adenoma detection rate after transition from air to water method for screening colonoscopy in a community-based setting in the United States.
Journal of Interventional Gastroenterology 2013 April
BACKGROUND: The water method of colonoscopy has been shown to increase adenoma detection rate in the United States veteran population, but this has not yet been demonstrated in a non-veteran community setting in the United States.
AIMS: Our aim is to perform a retrospective study to compare adenoma detection rate between the air and the water colonoscopy methods for screening colonoscopies at a non-veteran community site.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 100 patients from before and after a single community endoscopist transitioned from air colonoscopy to water colonoscopy. The patients selected were the 50 most recent patients who presented for air colonoscopy and the first 50 patients who underwent water colonoscopy after the transition. Patients who presented for indications other than colon cancer screening or surveillance were excluded. The primary end point was overall adenoma detection rate; secondary end points included cecal intubation time, procedure time, polyp detection rate, proximal colon adenoma detection rate, and sedation requirement.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two methods in total adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, cecal intubation time, total procedure time, or sedation requirement. However, there was a significantly higher proximal adenoma detection rate (34%) with the water method compared to the air method (18%), p=0.015.
CONCLUSION: In a non-veteran community setting, screening colonoscopy done with the water method resulted in a significantly higher proximal colon adenoma detection rate without significantly adding to total procedure time or sedation requirement.
AIMS: Our aim is to perform a retrospective study to compare adenoma detection rate between the air and the water colonoscopy methods for screening colonoscopies at a non-veteran community site.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 100 patients from before and after a single community endoscopist transitioned from air colonoscopy to water colonoscopy. The patients selected were the 50 most recent patients who presented for air colonoscopy and the first 50 patients who underwent water colonoscopy after the transition. Patients who presented for indications other than colon cancer screening or surveillance were excluded. The primary end point was overall adenoma detection rate; secondary end points included cecal intubation time, procedure time, polyp detection rate, proximal colon adenoma detection rate, and sedation requirement.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two methods in total adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, cecal intubation time, total procedure time, or sedation requirement. However, there was a significantly higher proximal adenoma detection rate (34%) with the water method compared to the air method (18%), p=0.015.
CONCLUSION: In a non-veteran community setting, screening colonoscopy done with the water method resulted in a significantly higher proximal colon adenoma detection rate without significantly adding to total procedure time or sedation requirement.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app