EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations (EBUS-FNA): correlation with adequacy and histologic follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive modality for diagnosing mediastinal lesions. When determining adequacy, EBUS-FNAs are evaluated for diagnostic material or sufficient lymphoid tissue. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with EBUS-FNAs and correlated the findings with adequacy and histologic follow-up.

METHODS: EBUS-FNAs were retrospectively reviewed over a 3-year period and correlated with the clinicopathologic findings, adequacy, and histologic follow-up.

RESULTS: In total, 593 EBUS-FNAs were obtained from 356 patients, including 420 (71%) satisfactory (SAT) cases, 107 (18%) less than optimal (LTO) cases, and 66 (11%) unsatisfactory (UNSAT) cases. The overall diagnostic yield was 71%, and the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes had better yield (72%) than the peripheral intrapulmonary and hilar (N1) lymph nodes (64%). Histologic follow-up was available in 203 cases (34%), and malignancy was identified in 7 UNSAT cases (23%), 6 LTO-negative cases (11%), and 4 SAT cases (3%) with a negative cytologic diagnosis. In the suboptimal cases with follow-up, 79% were benign and 21% were malignant on follow-up, including 25 (14%) with fibrosis or hyalinization. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in the study were 80%, 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The current data demonstrated that EBUS-FNA has good sensitivity, high specificity, and a higher diagnostic yield for N2 lymph nodes compared with N1 lymph nodes. The data also illustrate the finding that suboptimal cases have a greater risk of false-negative diagnoses and a 21% chance of malignancy, including processes with fibrosis or hyalinization.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app