JOURNAL ARTICLE
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Radial to femoral arterial blood pressure differences in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine therapy.

Shock 2013 December
OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of arterial blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is crucial in treating septic shock patients. Clinically significant differences in central to peripheral ABP could develop into sepsis during vasopressor therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between radial (peripheral) and femoral (central) ABP in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine (NE) therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective observational study comparing simultaneous intra-arterial measurements of radial and femoral ABP was performed at a university-affiliated, tertiary referral center between October 2008 and March 2009. Patients with septic shock who needed continuous blood pressure monitoring and high-dose NE therapy 0.1 µg/kg per minute or greater to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg or greater were included. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures. In total, 250 sets of systolic, mean, and diastolic femoral and radial ABP were recorded at baseline and after NE titration. Arterial blood pressure readings from the radial artery were underestimated compared with those from the femoral artery. Overall bias (mean difference between simultaneous measurements) between radial and femoral MAP was +4.9 mmHg; however, during high-dose NE therapy, the bias increased to +6.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -6.0 to +18.3 mmHg). Clinically significant radial-femoral MAP differences (MAP ≥5 mmHg) occurred in up to 62.2% of patients with high-dose NE therapy.

CONCLUSIONS: Radial artery pressure frequently underestimates central pressure in septic shock patients receiving high-dose NE therapy. Femoral arterial pressure monitoring may be more appropriate when high-dose NE therapy is administered.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app