We have located links that may give you full text access.
Would fewer port numbers in laparoscopy produce better cosmesis? Prospective study.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2014 January
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fewer ports in laparoscopic adnexal surgery would lead to better cosmesis.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred thirty consecutive patients with adnexal tumors.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent laparoscopy using a single port (n = 75), 2 ports (n = 22), or 4 ports (n = 33). Cosmetic satisfaction was assessed using a validated Body Image Questionnaire at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics (age, parity, and sociodemographic data), details of the procedures performed, and histologic findings were similar between the 3 surgical groups. There was also no difference in number of conversions to other surgical approaches, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, and perioperative complications. Compared with the 2- and 4-port groups, the single-port group reported substantially greater cosmetic satisfaction at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. However, there was no important difference in cosmetic outcome throughout follow-up in the 2-t and 4-port groups.
CONCLUSION: Unlike 2- or 4-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy has a definite benefit in cosmetic satisfaction.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University hospital.
PATIENTS: One hundred thirty consecutive patients with adnexal tumors.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent laparoscopy using a single port (n = 75), 2 ports (n = 22), or 4 ports (n = 33). Cosmetic satisfaction was assessed using a validated Body Image Questionnaire at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient characteristics (age, parity, and sociodemographic data), details of the procedures performed, and histologic findings were similar between the 3 surgical groups. There was also no difference in number of conversions to other surgical approaches, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain, and perioperative complications. Compared with the 2- and 4-port groups, the single-port group reported substantially greater cosmetic satisfaction at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. However, there was no important difference in cosmetic outcome throughout follow-up in the 2-t and 4-port groups.
CONCLUSION: Unlike 2- or 4-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy has a definite benefit in cosmetic satisfaction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app