Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is it possible to identify exacerbations of mild to moderate COPD that do not require antibiotic treatment?

Chest 2013 November
BACKGROUND: Anthonisen criteria are widely used to guide the use of antibiotics in exacerbations of COPD. We evaluated the best predictors of outcomes in exacerbations of mild to moderate COPD not treated with antibiotics.

METHODS: We used data from 152 patients of the placebo arm of a randomized trial of amoxicillin/clavulanate for exacerbations of mild to moderate COPD. Clinical response in relation to Anthonisen criteria and point-of-care serum C-reactive protein (CRP) tests (cutoff, 40 mg/L) was assessed with multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Clinical failure without antibiotics was 19.9% compared with 9.5% with amoxicillin/clavulanate (P = .022). The only factors significantly associated with an increased risk of failure without antibiotics were the increase in sputum purulence (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.5-25.0; P = .005) and a CRP concentration ≥ 40 mg/L (OR, 13.4; 95% CI, 4.6-38.8; P < .001). When both factors were present, the probability of failure without antibiotics was 63.7%. The Anthonisen criteria showed an area under the curve of 0.708 (95% CI, 0.616-0.801) for predicting clinical outcome. With the addition of CRP level, the area under the curve rose significantly to 0.842 (95% CI, 0.76-0.924; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Among the Anthonisen criteria, only an increase in sputum purulence is a significant predictor of failure without antibiotics. The use of a point-of-care CRP test significantly increases the predictive accuracy of failure. Both of these easy-to-obtain factors may help clinicians to identify patients with exacerbated mild to moderate COPD who can be safely treated without antibiotics in an ambulatory setting.

TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00495586; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app