We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Intubation by paramedics using the ILMA or AirTraq, KingVision, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in vehicle-entrapped patients: a manikin study.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2014 Februrary
Four devices were compared in a simulated scenario of a vehicle-entrapped patient: standard Macintosh laryngoscope, intubating laryngeal mask (ILMA), AirTraq optical laryngoscope, and KingVision videolaryngoscope. A group of 30 final-year paramedic students intubated a manikin placed in a sitting position under a desk simulating the roof of a car. Time of endotracheal intubation and success ratio were recorded. The baseline time of intubation was measured in a manikin lying down flat on the ground. The mean time to intubation was 13.9±6.6, 24.7±4.7, 25.2±3.7, and 23.9±4.2 s; the first attempt success ratios for devices were 29/30, 18/30, 6/30, and 18/30; and the baseline time of intubation was 14.3±6.5, 16.7±4.7, 22.9±12.6, and 18.1±5.0 s for ILMA, Macintosh laryngoscope, Airtraq, and KingVision, respectively. In emergency situations with very limited access to the patient, ILMA is the most effective device for intubation by paramedics.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app