We have located links that may give you full text access.
Right ventricular end-diastolic wall stress: does it impact on right atrial size, and does it differ in right ventricular pressure vs volume loading conditions?
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2013 July
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) diastolic dysfunction precedes RV systolic dysfunction. Improvement in noninvasive assessment of RV diastolic function may enable earlier detection of RV dysfunction, especially important in the assessment of patients with congenital heart disease. We investigated a new parameter we call RV end-diastolic wall stress (RVEDWS) in an effort to better characterize RV diastolic function.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive adults with right-sided congenital heart disease between January 2005 and November 2006. RVEDWS was calculated with the Laplace law: r × p/λ, where r = basal RV dimension at end-diastole, p = RV end-diastolic pressure obtained from catheterization of the right side of the heart, and λ = thickness of RV free wall at end-diastole in the subcostal view. Calculated RVEDWS was correlated to echocardiographically derived right atrial (RA) measurements by means of the Pearson correlation.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, aged 41 ± 15 years, were included in the study. Mean RVEDWS was 20 ± 11 g/cm(2) (range, 3-46 g/cm(2)). RVEDWS correlated significantly with RA area and volume (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001; r = 0.69, P < 0.001, respectively). An RVEDWS > 17 g/cm(2) had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 85% in predicting significant RA enlargement. RVEDWS was significantly higher in patients with RV volume overload compared with those with pressure or normal loading conditions (28 g/cm(2) vs 17 g/cm(2), P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: RVEDWS correlates significantly with RA size and differs considerably between RV volume and pressure overload states. Further work is needed to determine whether this RV diastolic parameter can be predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with RV loading lesions.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive adults with right-sided congenital heart disease between January 2005 and November 2006. RVEDWS was calculated with the Laplace law: r × p/λ, where r = basal RV dimension at end-diastole, p = RV end-diastolic pressure obtained from catheterization of the right side of the heart, and λ = thickness of RV free wall at end-diastole in the subcostal view. Calculated RVEDWS was correlated to echocardiographically derived right atrial (RA) measurements by means of the Pearson correlation.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, aged 41 ± 15 years, were included in the study. Mean RVEDWS was 20 ± 11 g/cm(2) (range, 3-46 g/cm(2)). RVEDWS correlated significantly with RA area and volume (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001; r = 0.69, P < 0.001, respectively). An RVEDWS > 17 g/cm(2) had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 85% in predicting significant RA enlargement. RVEDWS was significantly higher in patients with RV volume overload compared with those with pressure or normal loading conditions (28 g/cm(2) vs 17 g/cm(2), P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: RVEDWS correlates significantly with RA size and differs considerably between RV volume and pressure overload states. Further work is needed to determine whether this RV diastolic parameter can be predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with RV loading lesions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app