Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The spectrum of sclerosing cholangitis and the relevance of IgG4 elevations in routine practice.

OBJECTIVES: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidance recommends measurement of IgG4 in patients with sclerosing cholangitis (SC). The objective of this study was to evaluate this by analyzing our SC practice.

METHODS: Characteristics were collected on 168 patients with radiological or biopsy proven SC; IgG4 was measured and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies were reviewed.

RESULTS: In all, 49% of patients were females and 55% had inflammatory bowel disease. Large duct disease was present in 63%, small duct disease in 8%, overlap with AIH in 11%, and secondary SC in 18%. Secondary etiologies included autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) (8%), intra-hepatic cholelithiasis (3%), portal vein thrombosis (2%), and neonatal Kasai (2%). In all, 101 patients had sufficient radiology and serology for re-evaluation. IgG4 was elevated (>104 mg/dl) in 22% of patients. This was associated with male gender (73%; P=0.016), a past history of pancreatitis (27% vs. 5%; P=0.007), a higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) value, median 338.5 U/l vs. 160 (P=0.005), and a higher primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) Mayo risk score, mean 0.6 vs. -0.2 (P=0.0008). Prior biliary intervention was more likely (36 vs. 13%; P=0.023), while abnormal pancreatic imaging was noted in 15%, more frequently if IgG4 was elevated (40 vs. 8%; P=0.0007). After excluding those with pancreatic disease on magnetic resonance imaging, 14 patients had elevated IgG4. This group had higher ALP 379 U/l vs. 155.5 (P=0.0006), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 72.5 U/l vs. 34 (P=0.0005), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 90.5 U/l vs. 36 (P=0.004), and PSC Mayo risk score values 0.4 vs. -0.2 (P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS: SC is a heterogeneous liver injury. IgG4 testing may be clinically important in all patients, since it appears to identify a distinct patient population, more so than just those with AIP.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app