EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Boston Type I keratoprosthesis: an assessment of its efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Boston Type I keratoprosthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent surgery with implantation of the Boston Type I keratoprosthesis were monitored. The following parameters were considered: diagnosis, comorbidity, previous surgery, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, complications, and keratoprosthetic retention.

RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 42 months (mean: 23 months). The mean number of previous keratoplasties was 2.0. The percentage of patients whose best-corrected visual acuity improved was 83.3%, and 16.7% maintained their previous vision. No patient had preoperative visual acuity better than 0.05. Patients with glaucoma comorbidity had the most limited final postoperative vision. Four eyes presented limited corneal melt. In another two eyes, corneal stromal bleeding led to a vitreous hemorrhage that was completely resolved after some weeks. No endophthalmitis or extrusion of the device occurred.

CONCLUSION: The Boston Type I keratoprosthesis has a visual rehabilitation potential in cases of complicated corneal blindness, where the prognosis of a conventional keratoplasty is considered poor. Anatomical retention may be favorable in the medium term.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app