Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intravitreal bevacizumab versus combined intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: six-month results of a randomized clinical trial.

Retina 2011 October
PURPOSE: To determine whether combined intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and triamcinolone (IVT) is more effective than IVB alone in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial performed at two centers. Eligible eyes were assigned randomly to one of the two study arms. In the IVB group, 3 consecutive injections of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab were given 6 weeks apart, while in the IVB/IVT group, the first of the triple IVB injections was combined with 2 mg of IVB. A fourth IVB was injected in eyes demonstrating active choroidal neovascularization at Week 24.

RESULTS: Sixty and 55 eyes were in the IVB and IVB/IVT groups, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity improved, and central macular thickness was reduced significantly in both groups at all time points. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVB/IVT group compared with the IVB group 6 weeks (8.5 ± 14.4 vs. 3.8 ± 8.9 letters, P = 0.04) and 12 weeks (11.8 ± 16.6 vs. 6.2 ± 10.8 letters, P = 0.03) after initiation of therapy. However, there was no significant difference in visual improvement at Week 24 (11.3 ± 17.2 letters in the IVB/IVT group vs. 8.7 ± 15.6 letters in the IVB group, P = 0.40). The IVB/IVT group showed significantly less need for a fourth injection at Week 24 (34.5% vs. 53.3% in the IVB/IVT and IVB groups, respectively, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: Mandated therapy with IVB improved best-corrected visual acuity and decreased central macular thickness in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The addition of low-dose IVT temporarily increased the therapeutic efficacy in the early postinjection period and resulted in fewer requirements for repeat IVB injections at 6 months; however, final levels of visual improvement were comparable in the 2 study groups.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app