We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Flexible ureteroscopy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal lithiasis less or equal to 2 cm].
Progrès en Urologie 2011 Februrary
PURPOSE: Compare, in a retrospective study, the indications, the efficiency and the morbidity of the flexible ureteroscopy (URS) and the mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-perc) for the treatment of the renal lithiasis less or equal to 2 cm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four operated patients: 101 by "mini-perc" and 43 by URS. Pre-, per- and post-operative data prospectively entered in a computerized database.
RESULTS: URS and "mini-perc" groups were comparable in terms of age (49.2±14 years versus 51.7±16 years; P=0.37) and of size of the lithiasis (8.5±3.2 mm versus 8.9±2.7 mm, P=0.4). However, the number of lithiasis was more important in URS group (2.7±141.6 versus 1.3±0.38; P<0.05). The operating time was 59±32.6 min in URS and 48±28.3 min "mini-perc" group (P=0.05). The peroperating complication rate was 2% for URS (a false passage during the introduction of the access girdle) and null in the "mini-perc" group. The hospitalization was 1.49±11.4 days after URS and of 4.1±1.2 days after "mini-perc" (P<0.05). The duration of ureter drainage by stent was respectively 13.8±11.5 and 2.6±1.2 days (P<0.05). One month later, the treatment was effective in 88% of cases in the URS group whereas 93% in "mini-perc" group (P=0.17). Six patients (14%) need complementary treatment for residual lithiasis in the URS group and four (3.9%) in the "mini-perc" group.
CONCLUSION: The "mini-perc" and the URS are two effective techniques for the treatment of the renal lithiasies less or equal to 2 cm. For the two groups, the complication rates were low and the length of hospital stay was short.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four operated patients: 101 by "mini-perc" and 43 by URS. Pre-, per- and post-operative data prospectively entered in a computerized database.
RESULTS: URS and "mini-perc" groups were comparable in terms of age (49.2±14 years versus 51.7±16 years; P=0.37) and of size of the lithiasis (8.5±3.2 mm versus 8.9±2.7 mm, P=0.4). However, the number of lithiasis was more important in URS group (2.7±141.6 versus 1.3±0.38; P<0.05). The operating time was 59±32.6 min in URS and 48±28.3 min "mini-perc" group (P=0.05). The peroperating complication rate was 2% for URS (a false passage during the introduction of the access girdle) and null in the "mini-perc" group. The hospitalization was 1.49±11.4 days after URS and of 4.1±1.2 days after "mini-perc" (P<0.05). The duration of ureter drainage by stent was respectively 13.8±11.5 and 2.6±1.2 days (P<0.05). One month later, the treatment was effective in 88% of cases in the URS group whereas 93% in "mini-perc" group (P=0.17). Six patients (14%) need complementary treatment for residual lithiasis in the URS group and four (3.9%) in the "mini-perc" group.
CONCLUSION: The "mini-perc" and the URS are two effective techniques for the treatment of the renal lithiasies less or equal to 2 cm. For the two groups, the complication rates were low and the length of hospital stay was short.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app