[Surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniation].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of different surgical approaches to thoracic disc herniation, and to show the role of segmental fusion and selection of an appropriate microsurgical decompression technique for the successful outcome of surgery.

MATERIAL: A group of 27 patients, 10 men and 17 women, between 31 and 70 years (average age, 49.33 years) were included in this prospective study. They underwent surgery for thoracic degeneration disc disease in the period from June 1994 to August 2008.

METHODS: In all patients, the severity of myelopathy was assessed using the grading Frankel system and JOA score, axial and radicular pain intensity was evaluated with VAS and ODI rating systems. The diagnosis was established on the basis of thoracic spine radiography, thoracic spine MRI and a CT scan of the segment. A total of 30 thoracic segments, in the range of Th4/Th5 to Th12/L1, were indicated for surgery. Localisation of the hernia was medial at 19 segments, mediolateral at three and lateral at eight segments. Soft disc herniation was found in 17 cases and hard disc protrusion at the remaining 13 segments. Surgery for significant myelopathy was carried out in 23 patients and for pain in four patients. According to the surgical procedure used, the patients were allocated to two groups: group A comprised 10 patients treated without disc replacement through a laminectomy or a costotransversectomy exposure, and group B consisted of 17 patients undergo- ing intersomatic fusion via a thoracotomy. Clinical and radiographic examinations were made at regular intervals for at least 1 year of follow-up. The results of clinical assessment, including JOA scores, JOA Recovery Rate, VAS scores at rest and after exercise and ODI, were statistically analysed for each group and compared.

RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in JOA evaluation of myelopathy between the groups in group A, the mean JOA score declined from 7.9 to 7.0, i.e., -0.9 point, while in group B it increased from 6.71 to 9.12, i.e., +2.41 points. The mean JOA Recovery Rate did not reach a plus value in group A, while in group B it improved by 55 %. JOA Recovery Rate: Of the seven patients in group A evaluated for myelopathy, a fair result was in one, unchanged in two and worse in four patients. Of the 16 patients evaluated for myelopathy in group B, the results were excellent in four, good in six, fair in four and unchanged in two patients. Frankel grade function: In group A, one patient improved by one grade, two remained unchanged, two deteriorated by one grade and two by two grades. In group B, five patients improved by one grade, two patients by two grades and two patients by three grades. Eight patients remained unchanged and no patient deteriorated. The post-operative pain intensity, as assessed by the mean VAS score, was lower at rest and after exercise in both groups; the score was better in group B, but the difference was not statistically significant. The ODI was evaluated only in group B its mean value improved from 41.4% to 26.1%, i.e., by 15.3%.

DISCUSSION: Between 7 to 15 % of the patients have asymptomatic thoracic disc herniation, while symptomatic herniation is very rare and accounts for only 0.25 % to 0.57 % of herniated discs in the whole spine. Severe or progressive myelopathy is a clear indication for surgical intervention in thoracic disc herniation, but the role of surgery in pain control is controversial. There are five approaches for thoracic disc herniation. Transpleural anterolateral thoracotomy has an advantage over the other methods because it permits the treatment of all types of herniation, whether localised centrally, laterally or contralaterally, i.e., soft, calcified or sequestered intradural disc herniation. The results of treatment will depend on the outcome of surgical spinal cord decompression and the degree of spinal stabilisation achieved.

CONCLUSIONS: The surgical procedure via thoracotomy with intersomatic fusion resulted in a statistically more significant improvement of myelopathy than the posterior approach without disc replacement, and it provided greater pain relief. The authors recommend to treat thoracic disc herniation by discectomy via a thoracotomy and by intersomatic fusion.