We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Can childhood asthma be predicted at birth?
Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2010 December
BACKGROUND: Early life appears optimal for prevention of asthma, but interventions require a relevant target population, to date not clearly identified at birth.
OBJECTIVE: We therefore aimed to identify the predicting capacity of factors known around birth for asthma and rhinitis at 10 years.
METHODS: The included 614 healthy term babies with lung function measured at birth in the 1992/1993 Environment and Childhood Asthma study in Oslo attended a 10-year follow-up visit including a structured interview and skin prick test (SPT) for allergies. The logistic regression analyses included 37 general variables from an extensive birth questionnaire; lung function; cord blood total immunoglobulin E and soluble CD14. A history of asthma, current asthma, history of rhinitis and 'healthy' (no history of asthma, rhinitis and negative SPT) was predicted on a group level and individual predicted probabilities were calculated.
RESULTS: The predictability of the models [area under the curve (95% confidence intervals)] was 0.74 (0.69, 0.79), 0.72 (0.64, 0.78), 0.69 (0.54, 0.72) and 0.67 (0.62, 0.71) for a history of asthma, current asthma, rhinitis and 'healthy', respectively. The best model predicted a history of asthma correctly in 93/124 (75%), and incorrectly in 176/490 (36%) children without asthma. The positive predictive values for all outcomes were low (19-61), the highest predicting healthy.
CONCLUSION: Although at best 75% of children with a history of asthma could be predicted at birth, an intervention applied to our predicted high-risk children would be started more often in children without than with future disease. Parental allergic disease alone appears insufficient to identify high-risk populations in future studies of asthma and allergic disease.
OBJECTIVE: We therefore aimed to identify the predicting capacity of factors known around birth for asthma and rhinitis at 10 years.
METHODS: The included 614 healthy term babies with lung function measured at birth in the 1992/1993 Environment and Childhood Asthma study in Oslo attended a 10-year follow-up visit including a structured interview and skin prick test (SPT) for allergies. The logistic regression analyses included 37 general variables from an extensive birth questionnaire; lung function; cord blood total immunoglobulin E and soluble CD14. A history of asthma, current asthma, history of rhinitis and 'healthy' (no history of asthma, rhinitis and negative SPT) was predicted on a group level and individual predicted probabilities were calculated.
RESULTS: The predictability of the models [area under the curve (95% confidence intervals)] was 0.74 (0.69, 0.79), 0.72 (0.64, 0.78), 0.69 (0.54, 0.72) and 0.67 (0.62, 0.71) for a history of asthma, current asthma, rhinitis and 'healthy', respectively. The best model predicted a history of asthma correctly in 93/124 (75%), and incorrectly in 176/490 (36%) children without asthma. The positive predictive values for all outcomes were low (19-61), the highest predicting healthy.
CONCLUSION: Although at best 75% of children with a history of asthma could be predicted at birth, an intervention applied to our predicted high-risk children would be started more often in children without than with future disease. Parental allergic disease alone appears insufficient to identify high-risk populations in future studies of asthma and allergic disease.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app