We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Evaluation of MRI criteria (1.5 T) for the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis in healthy subjects.
Epilepsy Research 2010 May
PURPOSE: The presence of hippocampal sclerosis (HS) on MRI has a great impact on the clinical evaluation and counselling of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and is considered as a key criterion for the decision to recommend epilepsy surgery. However, neuropathological studies describe evidence of HS in up to 10% of non-epileptic individuals, questioning the impact of this MRI finding in patients with TLE. We evaluated the prevalence of HS on MRI in the general population.
METHODS: 100 healthy subjects and 10 patients with TLE due to HS were investigated in a prospective study using a specific protocol for the detection of hippocampal pathology (coronal FLAIR, coronal T2 TSE and a T1 weighted 3D SPGR sequence).
RESULTS: HS was detected in none of the healthy subjects (95% confidence interval=0-3.6%), but in all patients. Inter-rater agreement was perfect for presence of HS. Thirty-three subjects had an unilaterally enlarged temporal horn as an isolated secondary criterion for HS and inter-rater agreement was slight for this point. Incidental pathological findings were detected in two patients (2%): one had a low grade astrocytoma (1%), one an aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: HS was not diagnosed in healthy subjects, supporting its impact on the evaluation of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. An unilateral enlarged temporal horn that occurred in one third of the healthy subjects should not be considered as a pathologic finding or even as a marker for HS.
METHODS: 100 healthy subjects and 10 patients with TLE due to HS were investigated in a prospective study using a specific protocol for the detection of hippocampal pathology (coronal FLAIR, coronal T2 TSE and a T1 weighted 3D SPGR sequence).
RESULTS: HS was detected in none of the healthy subjects (95% confidence interval=0-3.6%), but in all patients. Inter-rater agreement was perfect for presence of HS. Thirty-three subjects had an unilaterally enlarged temporal horn as an isolated secondary criterion for HS and inter-rater agreement was slight for this point. Incidental pathological findings were detected in two patients (2%): one had a low grade astrocytoma (1%), one an aneurysm of the posterior communicating artery (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: HS was not diagnosed in healthy subjects, supporting its impact on the evaluation of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. An unilateral enlarged temporal horn that occurred in one third of the healthy subjects should not be considered as a pathologic finding or even as a marker for HS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app