We have located links that may give you full text access.
Morphologic, immunphenotypic and clinical discriminators between T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma and lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma.
Hematology/oncology and Stem Cell Therapy 2008 January
BACKGROUND: Features of T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) overlap with those of lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL). The two lymphomas may represent a spectrum of the same disease, and differentiation between the two can sometimes be difficult. We looked at histomorphologic, immunophenotypic and clinical information that may help differentiate the two entities.
METHODS: Cases of THRLBCL and LPHL were blindly reviewed and studied for histological pattern (nodular vs. diffuse), nuclear features and pattern of expression of CD20, CD30, CD57, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). A score encompassing diffuse histology, high nuclear grade, CD20 single-cell pattern, CD30+, CD57-, EMA-, and EBV+ was estimated for the diagnosis of TCHRLBCL.
RESULTS: There were 58 cases, including 30 cases of TCHRLBL and 28 cases of LPHL. The median age was 36 years for TCHRLBCL and 21 years for LPHL (P = 0.0001). Three types of nuclei were identified (lymphocytic/histocytic, Reed-Sternberg and centroblast-like). The latter two high-grade nuclei were suggestive of TCHRLBCL. TCHRLBCL and LPHL, respectively, showed diffuse histology, 90% vs. 4% (P = 0.001), single CD20+ cells, 93% vs. 3.5% (P = 0.00004), CD30+ cells, 30% vs. 0% (P = 0.01), CD57+ cells, 41% vs. 93% (P = 0.008), EMA+ cells, 27% vs. 60% (P = 0.113), EBV+ cells, 24% vs. 0% (P = 0.117), high nuclear grade, 70% vs. 0% (P = 0.001), total score 2-7 (mean 4.68) vs. 0-2 (mean 0.72) (P = 0.001), high stage, 86% vs. 7% (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a combination of multiple parameters can help differentiate between the two diseases. Two cases originally diagnosed as LPHL were re-assigned the diagnosis of THRLBCL.
METHODS: Cases of THRLBCL and LPHL were blindly reviewed and studied for histological pattern (nodular vs. diffuse), nuclear features and pattern of expression of CD20, CD30, CD57, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). A score encompassing diffuse histology, high nuclear grade, CD20 single-cell pattern, CD30+, CD57-, EMA-, and EBV+ was estimated for the diagnosis of TCHRLBCL.
RESULTS: There were 58 cases, including 30 cases of TCHRLBL and 28 cases of LPHL. The median age was 36 years for TCHRLBCL and 21 years for LPHL (P = 0.0001). Three types of nuclei were identified (lymphocytic/histocytic, Reed-Sternberg and centroblast-like). The latter two high-grade nuclei were suggestive of TCHRLBCL. TCHRLBCL and LPHL, respectively, showed diffuse histology, 90% vs. 4% (P = 0.001), single CD20+ cells, 93% vs. 3.5% (P = 0.00004), CD30+ cells, 30% vs. 0% (P = 0.01), CD57+ cells, 41% vs. 93% (P = 0.008), EMA+ cells, 27% vs. 60% (P = 0.113), EBV+ cells, 24% vs. 0% (P = 0.117), high nuclear grade, 70% vs. 0% (P = 0.001), total score 2-7 (mean 4.68) vs. 0-2 (mean 0.72) (P = 0.001), high stage, 86% vs. 7% (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a combination of multiple parameters can help differentiate between the two diseases. Two cases originally diagnosed as LPHL were re-assigned the diagnosis of THRLBCL.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app