JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Labour induction with 25 micrograms versus 50 micrograms intravaginal misoprostol in full term pregnancies.

Tropical Doctor 2010 January
We undertook this study in order to compare the efficacy of 25 microg versus 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction at term. The study population consisted of 120 women with term singleton pregnancies in vertex presentation booked for caesarean section. They had a Bishop scoring of <6 and a reactive fetal heart rate tracing. They were randomized into two groups, A and B, to receive 25 microg and 50 microg of vaginal misoprostol, respectively, 4 hourly with a maximum of five doses until the patient had three contractions in 10 minutes. There was no significant difference in the induction delivery interval between the two groups (12.52+/- 7.05 h in the 25 microg group versus 11.72+/- 6.74 h in the 50 microg group; P = 0.58). Of the women in the 25 microg group, 83.3% delivered vaginally as did 71.67% of those in the 50 microg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.128). There were significantly more women requiring oxytocin augmentation in the 25 microg group than in the 50 microg group (P = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in the rates of caesarean and operative vaginal delivery, meconium stained liquor, fetal distress or in the incidences of hyperstimulation between the two groups. Neonatal outcomes were similar. The intravaginal administrations of 25 microg, as well as 50 microg of misprostol, are equally efficacious in inducing labour. The 25 microg group more often required oxytocin as an adjunct.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app