We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson's (closed) vs Milligan Morgan's technique (open).
Nepal Medical College Journal : NMCJ 2009 June
This study was done to compare the efficacy of closed Vs open haemorrhoidectomy. The study design was unblinded randomised control trial at Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital. Total number of patients was 56 all with 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. Post operative pain was taken as main outcome measures. Operation time varied from 200 seconds for each haemorroidal cushion with open technique to 626 seconds by closed technique. The blood loss was not quantifiable in closed technique. Pain was scored on visual analogue scale. In closed group, the pain score was 4.9 immediate post operative period and 2.3 (24 hours later). In the other group, the scores were 7.8 and 6.9. These differences were significant. At the end of study we came to a conclusion that haemorrhoidectomy using closed technique has more advantages.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app